First phenological observations have been performed in Germany already in the 18th century. The onset dates of characteristic phases of plant development (phenological phases) are observed and recorded. Today, Germany's national meteorological service (Deutscher Wetterdienst, DWD) maintains a dense phenological observation network and a database with phenological observations. The data are used in many applications, esp. for advisory activities to agriculture or pollen dispersion information.
Phenology is the study of periodically recurring patterns of growth and development of plants and animal behaviour during the year (Lieth, 1974). These are closely related to weather and their long-term trends are therefore important indicators of the impact of climate change on the biosphere (Menzel, 2002; Settele et al., 2014). Phenological data are therefore a valuable source of information for agricultural advisory activities as well as for climate research (Richardson et al., 2013). Systematic collection of phenological data started in several European countries in the 18th century (see all contributions to Nekovář et al., 2008): in the UK Robert Marsham started to recorded 27 “indications of spring” in 1736. These included first flowering, first leafing and migrant bird records. Successive generations of the family continued with these recordings until 1958 (Sparks and Carey, 1995; Sparks and Collinson, 2008). In the middle of the 18th century the Swedish naturalist Carl von Linné initiated the first known phenological network with 18 stations in Sweden (Dahl and Langvall, 2008). The Economic Society of Bern founded the first phenological network of Switzerland in 1759 (Defila, 2008). About 30 years later the Societas Meteorologica Palatina carried out systematic phenological observations at several sites in Europe, with focus on Germany, between 1781 and 1792 (e.g. Ephemerides Societatis Meteorologicae Palatinae. observationes anni 1782; Wege, 2002). The first modern phenological network in the Austro-Hungarian Monarchy which included also parts of today's Czech Republic, Slovakia, Romania and Croatia was established by Carl Fritsch in the first half of the 19th century. Furthermore he developed und published several guidelines for phenological observations (Reiss, 1959; Koch et al., 2008).
In Germany the real breakthrough in phenology was achieved in 1882, when university professor Hermann Hoffmann and his colleagues prepared and published guidelines for the observation of phenological phases. These guidelines provided the basis for standardized observations in Germany and beyond. It gave rise to a Europe-wide monitoring network, as well as a number of regional networks in Germany.
The first long-term nationwide phenological observation network in Germany was set up by the Biological Institute for Agriculture and Forestry of the Reich in 1922. The network was run by this institute until 1936, when it was taken over by the Meteorological Service of the Reich and further developed by Fritz Schnelle (Schnelle, 1955).
Today, the phenological observation network is operated by Germany's national meteorological service (Deutscher Wetterdienst, DWD). An overview on the current status in European countries can be found in Nekovář et al. (2008).
Plants and their phenological phases in the current observation programme of Deutscher Wetterdienst. Abbreviations are explained in Table 2. German names are provided for users accessing the data via DWD's website.
Currently, about 1200 observers contribute to this network, the large majority of them on a voluntary basis. At approx. 60 sites the observations are performed by weather observers of DWD. Approx. 160 phenological phases of wild plants, agricultural crops, fruit trees and bushes, and grape vines are observed and archived in the phenological database of DWD. Tables 1 and 2 show the list of currently observed phases.
Two types of reporting strategies are applied: “Yearly reporters” transmit their data once a year in a report sheet and approx. 400 observers submit their reports by phone to the next weather station immediately after occurrence of the phenological phase.
The observation programme of the yearly reporters contains widely distributed wild plants, forest trees and ornamental shrubs, the most important agricultural crops, as well as frequently grown fruit plants and grape vines. The phenomena to be observed expand over the whole vegetation period, e.g. unfolding of leaves, flowering or leaf fall. These phases are clearly visible events in the development cycle of the plants and represent a change in their physiological condition.
The main purpose of the immediate reporting network is to provide up-to-date information on the current stage of plant development. This is especially important for advice to farmers and pollen information services. The network is still sufficiently dense for these tasks, but measures are taken to avoid further degradation, e.g. advertising efforts in cooperation with other government agencies.
A detailed instruction manual serves as a plant identification book for the plants contained in the observation programme (Deutscher Wetterdienst, 1991). It contains a picture of the habit of each plant and a precise photographic presentation of each phenological phase.
Observed phases and their abbreviations.
Typically, the observer defines the size of the observation area himself. An
area with a radius of 1.5 to 2 km is typically sufficient and the maximum
distance to the origin should not exceed 5 km. The altitude of the sites of
the plants should not differ by more than
The phenological reports have been archived since 1951. They are a component of the national climate database of DWD.
Until 1991, observations in Western and Eastern Germany have been carried out according to programmes that agreed in large parts. But in East Germany not all phases were integrated into the archives. However, activities have been started to also include these data, too. After the German reunification, a new observation programme with detailed observation instructions was defined in 1992 and has been used since then.
Locations of phenological observation sites and length of their time series. Green: at least 1 year of observations. Orange: 50 or more years of observations.
Number of stations in the database and length of their time series (within the period 1951 to 2010).
474 of the stations in the database cover a period of 50 years (or more; see Figs. 1 and 2), 164 stations cover a period of 60 years (within the period 1951–2010). However, not all phases have been observed over that period. Based on historical documents the database was expanded to the time before 1951. For the location Geisenheim these observations are available back to 1896 (Fig. 3).
Some phenological records held by the research station at Geisenheim go back to 1896. These show a marked shift towards earlier flowering times over the past 60 years.
An automatic quality control procedure is applied to the data (Zimmermann and Polte-Rudolf, 2013). In the first step, a test with predefined thresholds is applied, the temporal order of the phases is checked and it is tested if the temporal differences between subsequent phases are in a plausible range. In the next step, a spatial test is applied. Within a specific spatial range, the observed date of the phase at an individual site is compared with a statistically derived value for that area. The final result of the tests is provided as a quality indicator (e.g. “rejected” or “wrong”) together with the data. But even if a value is flagged as “rejected”, it might still be correct and useable. Frequently errors have causes that can be corrected afterwards (e.g. caused during technical conversion).
Starting backwards from 2012, also the data of previous years are controlled. For 2012, 1.8 % of the data have been flagged as “wrong”. For some stations, the error rate is significantly above the average rate. These cases are carefully analysed and where appropriate discussed with the observers.
The data of the intermediate observers are used by DWD for pollen information service and agrometorological advice. In combination with the weather forecasts they provide a basis for pest management and field irrigation as well as for a decision on favourable harvest dates or to allow the estimation of pollen dispersion. The data are also provided to universities, research institutes, public authorities, the media and many other customers.
The data are also used by DWD to create different types of charts that provide easy to understand visualisations of the temporal course of vegetation development. Such diagrams can be used to illustrate the year-to-year development but also long term shifts.
Growing seasons in Germany since 1991: mean beginning, duration (days) and ending defined by the period between “Forsythia (Forsythia suspensa) – beginning of flowering” and “Pedunculate Oak (Quercus robur) leaf fall”.
One simple example is the definition of a phenological “growing season”. The preferred choice for this purpose are wild growing plants that occur in all regions of Germany. DWD defines the growing season as the period between beginning of flowering of Forsythia and leaf fall of pendunculate oak. Figure 4 shows an example.
Indicator phases used to define the phenological seasons. Each season begins with an indicator phase and ends with the beginning of the next season. The alternative phase can be used if the indicator phase is not available.
A visualization with more detailed information are the “phenological clocks” that are based on the definition of the “seasons” of a “phenological year”. For that purpose ten different “phenological seasons” are defined based on specific growth stages of selected plants that are used as “indicator phases” (Table 3). This is typically done for a wider region but can also be done for individual sites. Each season begins with an indicator phase and ends with the beginning of the next season. When visualized as “double clocks” (concentric; see Fig. 5 for an example), these diagrams allow to easily compare a single year with the long-term mean or two climatological reference periods.
Phenological clock for Germany: indicator phases, mean beginning and duration of the phenological seasons. In this clock, the periods 1961–1990 and 1991–2010 are compared.
The phenological data are freely available via the website of DWD; e.g.
DWD contributes to the Pan European Phenology database (PEP725; successor of
COST-725 “Establishing a European Phenological Data Platform
for Climatological Applications”, see Sparks et al., 2009), which was set
up by the Austrian Central Institute for Meteorology and Geodynamics (ZAMG),
the Austrian Federal Ministry of Science and Research and the Economic
Interest Grouping of European National Meteorological Services (EUMETNET).
The main aim of PEP725 is to promote and support phenological research by
making available an annually updated pan-European database, providing open
access to phenological data for science, research and training (
Together with additional data sources, the phenological observations of DWD
are integrated into the Plant-Phenological Online Database PPODB (
Germany's national meteorological service maintains a dense phenological observation network. Observations are currently performed at about 1200 locations, mainly by voluntary observers. Approx. 400 observers submit their reports immediately after occurrence of the phenological phase. The information is used for several tasks of DWD, e.g. advice to farmers and pollen information services. The data are quality-controlled and stored in a database. The database contains times series covering several decades and is therefore a valuable source for research activities. The data are publicly available via the Climate Data Center of DWD and also integrated into international collections.
The authors are especially grateful to the many voluntary observers. Two reviewers helped to improve the manuscript. Edited by: J. Eitzinger Reviewed by: P. Nejedlik and one anonymous referee