<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<!DOCTYPE article PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD Journal Publishing with OASIS Tables v3.0 20080202//EN" "journalpub-oasis3.dtd">
<article xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:oasis="http://docs.oasis-open.org/ns/oasis-exchange/table" xml:lang="en" dtd-version="3.0"><?xmltex \bartext{17th EMS Annual Meeting: European Conference for Applied Meteorology and Climatology 2017}?>
  <front>
    <journal-meta><journal-id journal-id-type="publisher">ASR</journal-id><journal-title-group>
    <journal-title>Advances in Science and Research</journal-title>
    <abbrev-journal-title abbrev-type="publisher">ASR</abbrev-journal-title><abbrev-journal-title abbrev-type="nlm-ta">Adv. Sci. Res.</abbrev-journal-title>
  </journal-title-group><issn pub-type="epub">1992-0636</issn><publisher>
    <publisher-name>Copernicus Publications</publisher-name>
    <publisher-loc>Göttingen, Germany</publisher-loc>
  </publisher></journal-meta>
    <article-meta>
      <article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.5194/asr-15-183-2018</article-id><title-group><article-title>A new framework for probabilistic seasonal forecasts based on circulation
type classifications and driven <?xmltex \hack{\break}?>by an ensemble global model</article-title><alt-title>A new framework for probabilistic seasonal forecasts</alt-title>
      </title-group><?xmltex \runningtitle{A new framework for probabilistic seasonal forecasts}?><?xmltex \runningauthor{G. Messeri et al.}?>
      <contrib-group>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="yes" rid="aff1 aff2">
          <name><surname>Messeri</surname><given-names>Gianni</given-names></name>
          <email>messeri@lamma.rete.toscana.it</email>
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff2">
          <name><surname>Benedetti</surname><given-names>Riccardo</given-names></name>
          
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff1">
          <name><surname>Crisci</surname><given-names>Alfonso</given-names></name>
          
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff2">
          <name><surname>Gozzini</surname><given-names>Bernardo</given-names></name>
          
        <ext-link>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0730-095X</ext-link></contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff1 aff2">
          <name><surname>Rossi</surname><given-names>Matteo</given-names></name>
          
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff1 aff2">
          <name><surname>Vallorani</surname><given-names>Roberto</given-names></name>
          
        <ext-link>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1790-1318</ext-link></contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff3">
          <name><surname>Maracchi</surname><given-names>Giampiero</given-names></name>
          
        </contrib>
        <aff id="aff1"><label>1</label><institution>Institute of Biometeorology of the National Research Council
(IBIMET-CNR) – Florence, Italy</institution>
        </aff>
        <aff id="aff2"><label>2</label><institution>Laboratory of Monitoring and Environmental Modelling for the
Sustainable Development<?xmltex \hack{\break}?> (LaMMA consortium) – Sesto Fiorentino – Florence,
Italy</institution>
        </aff>
        <aff id="aff3"><label>3</label><institution>Accademia dei Georgofili – Florence, Italy</institution>
        </aff>
      </contrib-group>
      <author-notes><corresp id="corr1">Gianni Messeri (messeri@lamma.rete.toscana.it)</corresp></author-notes><pub-date><day>3</day><month>August</month><year>2018</year></pub-date>
      
      <volume>15</volume>
      <fpage>183</fpage><lpage>190</lpage>
      <history>
        <date date-type="received"><day>15</day><month>February</month><year>2018</year></date>
           <date date-type="rev-recd"><day>2</day><month>July</month><year>2018</year></date>
           <date date-type="accepted"><day>23</day><month>July</month><year>2018</year></date>
      </history>
      <permissions>
        
        
      <license license-type="open-access"><license-p>This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License. To view a copy of this licence, visit <ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/">https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/</ext-link></license-p></license></permissions><self-uri xlink:href="https://asr.copernicus.org/articles/15/183/2018/asr-15-183-2018.html">This article is available from https://asr.copernicus.org/articles/15/183/2018/asr-15-183-2018.html</self-uri><self-uri xlink:href="https://asr.copernicus.org/articles/15/183/2018/asr-15-183-2018.pdf">The full text article is available as a PDF file from https://asr.copernicus.org/articles/15/183/2018/asr-15-183-2018.pdf</self-uri>
      <abstract>
    <p id="d1e148">In the last years coupled atmospheric ocean climate
models have remarkably improved medium range seasonal forecasts, especially
on middle latitude areas such as Europe and the Mediterranean basin. In this
study a new framework for medium range seasonal forecasts is proposed. It is
based on circulation types extracted from long range global ensemble models
and it aims at two goals: (i) an easier use of the information contained in
the complex system of atmospheric circulations, through their reduction to a
limited number of circulation types and (ii) the computation of high spatial
resolution probabilistic forecasts for temperature and precipitation. The
proposed framework could be also useful to lead predictions of
weather-derived parameters, such as the risk of heavy rainfall, drought or
heat waves, with important impacts on agriculture, water management and
severe weather risk assessment. Operatively, starting from the ensemble
predictions of mean sea level pressure and geopotential height at 500 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M1" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">hPa</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> of
the NCEP – CFSv2 long range forecasts, the third-quantiles probabilistic
maps of 2 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M2" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> temperature and precipitation are computed through a Bayesian
approach by using E-OBS 0.25<inline-formula><mml:math id="M3" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> gridded datasets. Two different
classification schemes with nine classes were used: (i) Principal Component
Transversal (PCT9), computed on mean sea level pressure and (ii) Simulated
Annealing Clustering (SAN9), computed on geopotential height at 500 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M4" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">hPa</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>.
Both were chosen for their best fit concerning the ground-level
precipitation and temperature stratification for the Italian peninsula.
Following this approach an operative chain based on a very flexible and
exportable method was implemented, applicable wherever spatially and
temporally consistent datasets of weather observations are available.</p>
    <p id="d1e181">In this paper the model operative chain, some output examples and a first
attempt of qualitative verification are shown. In particular three case
studies (June 2003, February 2012 and July 2014) were examined, assuming
that the ensemble seasonal model correctly predicts the circulation type
occurrences. At least on this base, the framework here proposed has shown
promising performance.</p>
  </abstract>
    </article-meta>
  </front>
<body>
      

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F1" specific-use="star"><caption><p id="d1e188">Diagram of the proposed framework for seasonal forecasts.</p></caption>
      <?xmltex \igopts{width=341.433071pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://asr.copernicus.org/articles/15/183/2018/asr-15-183-2018-f01.png"/>

    </fig>

<?pagebreak page184?><sec id="Ch1.S1" sec-type="intro">
  <title>Introduction</title>
      <p id="d1e202">Seasonal forecasting attempts to provide useful probabilistic information
about the climate that can be expected in the coming few months. The seasonal forecasts target is not a possible
snapshot of continually changing atmospheric conditions, but rather a likely
preview of the main weather events occurring in a given season. Consequently
long-term predictions fall into the realm of essentially probabilistic
problems. Due to their chaotic nature, atmospheric states just a few weeks
forward in time are predictable only in terms of a probability cloud,
possibly conditioned to slowly changing variables, such as the ocean's
surface temperatures. Global climate models based on ocean-atmosphere
coupling are frequently used with an ensemble approach to sample the
inherent atmospheric uncertainty (Leutbecher and Palmer, 2007). There is a
growing interest in a wide swath of user communities for the seasonal
forecasts on both global and local scale, but the skill of the forecasts, as
well as the type of the provided information, needs to be improved.</p>
      <p id="d1e205">Remarkably the importance of a probabilistic way to communicate predictions,
for instance weather warning, was already stressed at the beginning of the
twentieth century:</p>
      <p id="d1e208">“The most appropriate system seems therefore to be to leave to the clients
concerned by the warning to form an idea of the value of loss/cost and to
issue the warnings in such a form that the larger or smaller probability of
the event gets clear from the formulation. The client may then himself
consider if it is worth while to make arrangements of protection, or to
disregard a given warning.” (Angström, 1922).</p>
      <p id="d1e211">The method proposed here for probabilistic seasonal forecasts at high
resolution starts from a climatological ensemble global model (the NCEP-NCAR
CFSv2) and reduces the atmospheric complexity through a circulation types
classification approach. The European project Cost Action 733 (2008–2010)
gave a significant contribution for atmospheric circulation type
classifications, in order to evaluate their skill in stratifying surface
climate elements or other weather related environmental variables. The
adopted technique rely on a discrete characterization of atmospheric
circulations grouped into subsets (Huth et al., 2015; Philipp et al., 2014).
In addition, the other key factor of this framework is the increase of the
spatial resolution, through a sort of statistical downscaling (see for
instance Nikulin et al., 2018; and Manzanas et al., 2018) to improve the
dependence of climatic factors on geographical characteristics and
orographic complexities. This goal was achieved thanks to the availability
of a consistent high-resolution surface data, such as the E-OBS gridded
datasets from the European Climate Assessment &amp; Dataset project (Haylock
et al., 2008). Furthermore, a Bayesian procedure was used for producing
probabilistic forecasts suitable for decision-making processes and risk
assessment. The Bayesian algorithm merges the information coming from the
ensemble monthly forecast (i.e the predicted probability for the possible
circulation types) with the climatology of the predictands for each
circulation type. The final output is the probability for each predictand
given both the ensemble forecast and the climatological data, that is a
single product which preserves the possibility to separately evaluate the
different sources of uncertainty.</p>
      <p id="d1e215">Further investigations will be carried out to characterize each circulations
type in terms of occurrences of heavy precipitation, cold spells, heat
waves, landslides, snowfall, or dry spells, which are very important
variables for many activities like agriculture, water management, energy
provision and severe weather risk assessment. Indeed the relationship
between circulation weather type classifications and high-impact weather
events was also shown in previous studies concerning extreme precipitation
(Fernandez-Montes et al., 2014), extreme temperature episodes (Kysely,
2008), floods (Prudhomme and Genevier, 2011), droughts (Russo et al., 2015),
and even lightning activity (Ramos et al., 2011).</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S2">
  <title>Data and method</title>
      <p id="d1e224">The main core of the operative chain for the proposed methodology of
seasonal forecasts is based on the weather type classification software
package, developed within the project COST733 (Philipp et al., 2014). This
software has been used for both the calibration and the forecast module of
the operative chain, as illustrated in Fig. 1.</p>
      <p id="d1e227">The calibration was carried out on NCEP-NCAR Reanalysis 2 data (Kanamitsu et al., 2002)   between 1979
and 2015 through a sensitivity analysis detailed in a specific study
(Vallorani et al., 2017). In summary several circulation type
classifications were computed with different classification methods, number
of types and classification variables (i.e. predictands). Then such
classifications were compared through the use of proper statistical indexes
in order to assess the stratification of the ground-level precipitation and
the surface air temperature across Italian peninsula. The PCT (Principal
Component Transversal) and the SAN (Simulated Annealing) methods with 9
classes computed on MSLP and 500HGT (Vallorani et al., 2018) were selected as the best performing
classifications for precipitation and temperature respectively (see in Fig. 2
the centroid maps for PCT09 and SAN09 classifications as a result of the
calibration module, where the centroids are the central value of the
class/cluster). Climatological values of rainfall amount, wet days (number
of days with a daily rainfall exceeding the 0.4 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M5" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">mm</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> sensitivity limit), and
minimum, maximum and mean temperature were consequently calculated for each
of the nine circulation types over the period 1981–2010, on a monthly basis.</p>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F2" specific-use="star"><caption><p id="d1e239">Centroids of PCT09 classification implemented on mean sea
level pressure (Fig. 2a, values in <inline-formula><mml:math id="M6" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">hPa</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> on the right side of color bar)
computed for ground-level precipitation and <bold>(a)</bold> SAN09 classification implemented
on geopotential height at 500 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M7" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">hPa</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> (Fig. 2b, values in tens of metres on the
right side of color bar) computed for 2 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M8" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> temperature <bold>(b)</bold>. Each map
represents the central value of the circulation type as a result of the
calibration procedure.</p></caption>
        <?xmltex \igopts{width=497.923228pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://asr.copernicus.org/articles/15/183/2018/asr-15-183-2018-f02.png"/>

      </fig>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F3" specific-use="star"><caption><p id="d1e278">June 2003: observations E-OBS versus the operational
chain re-forecast: the E-OBS occurrence frequency of rainy days <bold>(a)</bold>, the
re-forecast probability of the rainy days occurrence <bold>(b)</bold>, the E-OBS tertile
climatological distribution <bold>(c)</bold>, the re-forecast probability to stay below
the lower tertile <bold>(d)</bold>, the re-forecast probability to stay within the median
tertile <bold>(e)</bold> and the re-forecast probability to stay above the upper tertile <bold>(f)</bold>.</p></caption>
        <?xmltex \igopts{width=497.923228pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://asr.copernicus.org/articles/15/183/2018/asr-15-183-2018-f03.png"/>

      </fig>

      <p id="d1e306">The weather type classifier is also used operatively in the forecast module.
Each of the 40 members of MSLP and 500HGT extracted from the NCEP – CFSv2
global model are converted into daily series of circulation types for the
future 90 days. For each record of the 40 members the dissimilarity/distance
between the record and the centroids are<?pagebreak page185?> calculated and the circulation type
number is chosen to be the one with the minimum distance. The probability
output maps are finally computed trough a Bayesian algorithm (described in
Sect. 2.1) which combine ensemble forecasts, circulation types and
climatology.</p>
      <p id="d1e309">In this paper a preliminary test is carried out on three case studies on
Italy, all with important temperature or rain anomalies: June 2003, February 2012, and July 2014. The obtained results are then qualitatively compared
with the observed values during these three months, taken from the
<?xmltex \hack{\mbox\bgroup}?>E-OBS<?xmltex \hack{\egroup}?>
gridded dataset. Since the purpose of this first test is to verify the
predicting capability of the climatological and circulation types
contribution, rather than the goodness of the ensemble forecast (EF), the
probabilistic weights coming from EF (the terms <inline-formula><mml:math id="M9" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>P</mml:mi><mml:mfenced close=")" open="("><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CT</mml:mi><mml:mi>i</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">|</mml:mi><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">EF</mml:mi><mml:mi>m</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:mfenced></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>  in Eq. 2) have been collapsed to zero with the <?pagebreak page186?>only exception of the one
related to the actually occurred circulation type, as derived by the
Reanalysis 2 dataset. This is equivalent to assume a perfect forecast (all
the members of EF predict the same circulation type), whereas in practice a
spread of the members on different circulation types is expected. Finally
the so predicted precipitation and temperature fields, and in particular the
probability of having values below the lower or above the upper
climatological tertile, are compared with the E-OBS values.</p>
<sec id="Ch1.S2.SSx1" specific-use="unnumbered">
  <title>The Bayesian basic formula</title>
      <p id="d1e343">The searched probability for the value <inline-formula><mml:math id="M10" display="inline"><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> of a target variable, (i.e.
surface daily mean temperature or precipitation) in a given day of the month
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M11" display="inline"><mml:mi>m</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> is conditioned to both the global ensemble forecast EF<inline-formula><mml:math id="M12" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi>m</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> and the
climatology <inline-formula><mml:math id="M13" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>C</mml:mi><mml:mi>m</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> for that month. By the marginalization rule applied on
the set of nine circulation types CT<inline-formula><mml:math id="M14" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi>i</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>, the searched conditional
probability can be written as:

                <disp-formula specific-use="align" content-type="numbered"><mml:math id="M15" display="block"><mml:mtable displaystyle="true"><mml:mtr><mml:mtd><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true" class="stylechange"/></mml:mtd><mml:mtd><mml:mrow><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true" class="stylechange"/><mml:mi>P</mml:mi><mml:mfenced open="(" close=")"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>x</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">|</mml:mi><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">EF</mml:mi><mml:mi>m</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:msub><mml:mi>C</mml:mi><mml:mi>m</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:mfenced><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:msubsup><mml:mo>∑</mml:mo><mml:mrow><mml:mi>i</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">9</mml:mn></mml:msubsup><mml:mi>P</mml:mi><mml:mfenced open="(" close=")"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>x</mml:mi><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CT</mml:mi><mml:mi>i</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">|</mml:mi><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">EF</mml:mi><mml:mi>m</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:msub><mml:mi>C</mml:mi><mml:mi>m</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:mfenced></mml:mrow></mml:mtd></mml:mtr><mml:mlabeledtr id="Ch1.E1"><mml:mtd/><mml:mtd><mml:mstyle class="stylechange" displaystyle="true"/></mml:mtd><mml:mtd><mml:mrow><mml:mstyle class="stylechange" displaystyle="true"/><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="1em"/><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:msubsup><mml:mo>∑</mml:mo><mml:mrow><mml:mi>i</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">9</mml:mn></mml:msubsup><mml:mi>P</mml:mi><mml:mfenced close=")" open="("><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CT</mml:mi><mml:mi>i</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">|</mml:mi><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">EF</mml:mi><mml:mi>m</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:msub><mml:mi>C</mml:mi><mml:mi>m</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:mfenced><mml:mo>⋅</mml:mo><mml:mi>P</mml:mi><mml:mfenced close=")" open="("><mml:mrow><mml:mi>x</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">|</mml:mi><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">EF</mml:mi><mml:mi>m</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:msub><mml:mi>C</mml:mi><mml:mi>m</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mi>C</mml:mi><mml:msub><mml:mi>T</mml:mi><mml:mi>i</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:mfenced><mml:mo>,</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:mtd></mml:mlabeledtr></mml:mtable></mml:math></disp-formula>

            where the right hand term has been obtained by simply applying the product
rule. The probability distribution <inline-formula><mml:math id="M16" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>P</mml:mi><mml:mfenced close=")" open="("><mml:mrow><mml:mi>x</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">|</mml:mi><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">EF</mml:mi><mml:mi>m</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:msub><mml:mi>C</mml:mi><mml:mi>m</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:mfenced></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> is thus expressed by the sum of products, each
containing two terms: the first one, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M17" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>P</mml:mi><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CT</mml:mi><mml:mi>i</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">|</mml:mi><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">EF</mml:mi><mml:mi>m</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:msub><mml:mi>C</mml:mi><mml:mi>m</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, is
the probability that the circulation  type <inline-formula><mml:math id="M18" display="inline"><mml:mi>i</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> occurs at the day of interest
given both the global ensemble forecast and the climatology; the second
one, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M19" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>P</mml:mi><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi>x</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">|</mml:mi><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">EF</mml:mi><mml:mi>m</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:msub><mml:mi>C</mml:mi><mml:mi>m</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CT</mml:mi><mml:mi>i</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, is the probability that the target
variable takes the value <inline-formula><mml:math id="M20" display="inline"><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> given the global ensemble forecast, the
climatology and the circulation type <inline-formula><mml:math id="M21" display="inline"><mml:mi>i</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>.</p>
      <p id="d1e636">The first term can be explicitly computed assuming that the ensemble
forecast is significantly more informative than climatology in determining
the circulation type occurrence, so making the climatology nearly irrelevant
(indeed any seasonal forecast unable to improve climatological predictions
is in practice useless). Hence <inline-formula><mml:math id="M22" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>P</mml:mi><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CT</mml:mi><mml:mi>i</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">|</mml:mi><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">EF</mml:mi><mml:mi>m</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:msub><mml:mi>C</mml:mi><mml:mi>m</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mi>P</mml:mi><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CT</mml:mi><mml:mi>i</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">|</mml:mi><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">EF</mml:mi><mml:mi>m</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>. Similarly the second term can be easily
computed if the value of the target variable is better determined by the
climatology of each given <inline-formula><mml:math id="M23" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CT</mml:mi><mml:mi>i</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> than using directly the ensemble
forecasts: <inline-formula><mml:math id="M24" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>P</mml:mi><mml:mfenced close=")" open="("><mml:mrow><mml:mi>x</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">|</mml:mi><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">EF</mml:mi><mml:mi>m</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:msub><mml:mi>C</mml:mi><mml:mi>m</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mi>C</mml:mi><mml:msub><mml:mi>T</mml:mi><mml:mi>i</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:mfenced><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mi>P</mml:mi><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi>x</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">|</mml:mi><mml:msub><mml:mi>C</mml:mi><mml:mi>m</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CT</mml:mi><mml:mi>i</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>.</p>
      <p id="d1e753">Thus the conditional probability (1) can be definitely rewritten as:
            <disp-formula id="Ch1.E2" content-type="numbered"><mml:math id="M25" display="block"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>P</mml:mi><mml:mfenced close=")" open="("><mml:mrow><mml:mi>x</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">|</mml:mi><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">EF</mml:mi><mml:mi>m</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:msub><mml:mi>C</mml:mi><mml:mi>m</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:mfenced><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:msubsup><mml:mo>∑</mml:mo><mml:mrow><mml:mi>i</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">9</mml:mn></mml:msubsup><mml:mi>P</mml:mi><mml:mfenced open="(" close=")"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CT</mml:mi><mml:mi>i</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">|</mml:mi><mml:mi>E</mml:mi><mml:msub><mml:mi>F</mml:mi><mml:mi>m</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:mfenced><mml:mo>⋅</mml:mo><mml:mi>P</mml:mi><mml:mfenced open="(" close=")"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>x</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">|</mml:mi><mml:msub><mml:mi>C</mml:mi><mml:mi>m</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CT</mml:mi><mml:mi>i</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:mfenced><mml:mo>,</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></disp-formula>
          where the first term of the product on the right hand side accounts for the
circulation types predicted by the global ensemble model, whereas the second
term is directly given by the frequency distribution of the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M26" display="inline"><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> values for each
circulation type, as extracted by the dataset on which the climatology is
based.</p>
      <p id="d1e841">As concerns precipitation, the dry days (precipitation below the 0.4 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M27" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">mm</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>
limit of sensitivity) has been preliminary separated by the wet ones, and
then the rainfall amount given the day is wet extracted (from the observed
data) or computed (as predicted probability for the observed value).</p>

<?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><table-wrap id="Ch1.T1" specific-use="star"><caption><p id="d1e855">Frequency climatological anomaly for the 3 case studies. Those anomalies with an occurrence of greater than four days per month are
shown in bold.</p></caption><oasis:table frame="topbot"><?xmltex \begin{scaleboxenv}{.85}[.85]?><oasis:tgroup cols="19">
     <oasis:colspec colnum="1" colname="col1" align="left"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="2" colname="col2" align="right"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="3" colname="col3" align="right"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="4" colname="col4" align="right"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="5" colname="col5" align="right"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="6" colname="col6" align="right"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="7" colname="col7" align="right"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="8" colname="col8" align="right"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="9" colname="col9" align="right"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="10" colname="col10" align="right" colsep="1"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="11" colname="col11" align="right"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="12" colname="col12" align="right"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="13" colname="col13" align="right"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="14" colname="col14" align="right"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="15" colname="col15" align="right"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="16" colname="col16" align="right"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="17" colname="col17" align="right"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="18" colname="col18" align="right"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="19" colname="col19" align="right"/>
     <oasis:thead>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"/>
         <oasis:entry namest="col2" nameend="col10" align="center" colsep="1">SAN9 – two metres temperature </oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry namest="col11" nameend="col19" align="center">PCT9 - precipitation </oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
     </oasis:thead>
     <oasis:tbody>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Circulation type</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">CT1</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">CT2</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">CT3</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">CT4</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">CT5</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">CT6</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">CT7</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col9">CT8</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col10">CT9</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col11">CT1</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col12">CT2</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col13">CT3</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col14">CT4</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col15">CT5</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col16">CT6</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col17">CT7</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col18">CT8</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col19">CT9</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">JUNE  2003</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">0</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M28" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>1</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M29" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula><bold>6</bold></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M30" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>1</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">0</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">0</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col8"><bold>11</bold></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col9">0</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col10"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M31" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>2</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col11">1</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col12"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M32" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>3</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col13">3</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col14">1</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col15">2</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col16"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M33" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>2</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col17">0</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col18">0</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col19"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M34" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>1</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">FEBRUARY 2012</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M35" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula><bold>4</bold></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M36" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>1</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M37" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>1</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">0</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6"><bold>4</bold></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7"><bold>8</bold></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">0</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col9"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M38" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula><bold>4</bold></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col10">0</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col11">0</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col12"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M39" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>1</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col13"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M40" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>3</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col14"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M41" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>2</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col15">1</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col16"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M42" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>3</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col17"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M43" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>1</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col18"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M44" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>1</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col19"><bold>11</bold></oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">JULY  2014</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">0</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">0</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">1</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">2</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">0</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">0</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col8"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M45" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula><bold>6</bold></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col9">0</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col10">2</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col11"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M46" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>2</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col12"><bold>5</bold></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col13">0</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col14">0</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col15"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M47" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>1</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col16">2</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col17">1</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col18"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M48" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>3</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col19"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M49" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>1</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
     </oasis:tbody>
   </oasis:tgroup><?xmltex \end{scaleboxenv}?></oasis:table></table-wrap>

</sec>
</sec>
<?pagebreak page187?><sec id="Ch1.S3">
  <title>Results</title>
      <p id="d1e1322">A first, little more than qualitative, verification was carried out on three
months that are all characterized by an unusual occurrence of some
circulation types, generating important temperature or precipitation
anomalies. The monthly occurrences of each CT with respect to the reference
climatological period (1981–2010) are reported in Table 1.</p>
      <p id="d1e1325">For each case study two kinds of semi-quantitative comparison are shown: (i) the observed occurrences of rainy days (i.e. the fraction of rainy days
within the month) versus the simulated mean probability of rainy day
occurrences, and (ii) the observed monthly mean temperature (at 2 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M50" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>)
classified into 3 intervals according to the climatological tertiles (i.e.
observed tertile climatological distribution) versus the simulated mean
probability of having a day with mean temperature below the lower tertile or
above the upper one, or within the two tertiles.</p>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F4" specific-use="star"><caption><p id="d1e1337">February 2012: observations E-OBS versus the operational
chain re-forecast: the E-OBS occurrence frequency of rainy days <bold>(a)</bold>, the
re-forecast probability of the rainy days occurrence <bold>(b)</bold>, the E-OBS tertile
climatological distribution <bold>(c)</bold>, the re-forecast probability to stay below
the lower tertile <bold>(d)</bold>, the re-forecast probability to stay within the median
tertile <bold>(e)</bold> and the re-forecast probability to stay above the upper tertile <bold>(f)</bold>.</p></caption>
        <?xmltex \igopts{width=497.923228pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://asr.copernicus.org/articles/15/183/2018/asr-15-183-2018-f04.png"/>

      </fig>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F5" specific-use="star"><caption><p id="d1e1368">July 2014: observations E-OBS versus the operational
chain re-forecast: the E-OBS occurrence frequency of rainy days <bold>(a)</bold>, the
re-forecast probability of the rainy days occurrence <bold>(b)</bold>, the E-OBS tertile
climatological distribution <bold>(c)</bold>, the re-forecast probability to stay below
the lower tertile <bold>(d)</bold>, the re-forecast probability to stay within the median
tertile <bold>(e)</bold> and the re-forecast probability to stay above the upper tertile <bold>(f)</bold>.</p></caption>
        <?xmltex \igopts{width=497.923228pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://asr.copernicus.org/articles/15/183/2018/asr-15-183-2018-f05.png"/>

      </fig>

      <p id="d1e1396"><italic>June 2003</italic> is part of the hottest summer on record in Europe, with
thermal monthly anomaly up to 5–6 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M51" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>C  on inland central-northern
areas of Italy (Fig. 3c). This month was thermally characterized by an
extraordinary frequency of circulation type 7 in the SAN9 classification
(<inline-formula><mml:math id="M52" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">11</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> days compared to the climatological frequency), while the anomalies
in PCT9 were less evident (Table 1). As shown in Fig. 3a and b, a good
matching is found between the observed fraction of rainy days and the mean
predicted probability, whose highest values are located in the alpine region
and the lowest in southern Italy. Concerning the 2 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M53" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> temperature, the
simulation shows the highest probability (around 50–70 %) to exceed the
upper climatological tertile all over Italy (Fig. 3f). Moreover, the
probability for values below the lower tertile (Fig. 3d) is low all over the
country (around 10–20 %). This results are in good accordance with the
observed monthly mean temperature (Fig. 3c).</p>
      <p id="d1e1427"><italic>February 2012</italic> was characterized by north Atlantic blocking to zonal
flux and advection of continental Euro-Asiatic air masses into Mediterranean
basin. Very cold spells occurred during the first half of the month with
frequent snowfalls on central-southern Italy due to a quasi-stationary low
between southern Tyrrhenian and Ionian Sea. The persistence of this kind of
circulation was highlighted by a strong positive anomalies of circulation
type 9 in the PCT9 classification, while negative anomalies of circulation
types 1 and 8 were counterbalanced by positive anomalies of circulation
types 5 and 6 for the SAN9 classification (Table 1). Also for this case
study the simulated probability of rainy days occurrence and the observed
percentage of rainy days show very similar patterns and values all over the
domain. Likewise, the observed monthly mean temperature fell below the lower
tertile in good accordance with the predictions, with the lower tertile
probability map (Fig. 4d) showing values between 50–60 % on a large part
of the domain.</p>
      <p id="d1e1432"><italic>July 2014</italic> was anomalously characterized by numerous instability
episodes and fronts crossing Italy, determining negative thermal anomaly all
over the Italian peninsula and several rainy days on central and northern
Italy (Fig. 5a).</p>
      <p id="d1e1437">According to these characteristics, Table 1 pointed out some anomalies in
the circulation types and in particular a 6 days negative anomaly of
circulation type 7 for SAN9 and a 5 days positive anomaly of circulation
type 2 for PCT9. Concerning the percentage of rainy days (Fig. 5a and b), this case study shows less satisfactory results, despite the overall
pattern remains quite well described. A lack of rainy days was evident on
central and northern Italy (Fig. 5b). On the contrary, the tertile
probability maps for 2 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M54" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> temperature show good agreement with the
observed tertile climatological distribution.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S4" sec-type="conclusions">
  <title>Conclusions</title>
      <p id="d1e1453">The operative chain for seasonal forecast illustrated in this paper is a
flexible and exportable solution for computing mesoscale probability
distribution of surface meteorological variables, like temperature and
precipitation. Spatial resolution is strongly dependent on the surface
observation datasets. In our application of the method, the E-OBS gridded
datasets (Haylock et al., 2008) at 25 km proved to be an acceptable
solution for describing the geographical heterogeneity and orographic
complexity of the Italian peninsula. However other consistent datasets could
be used whenever they are available. For instance, a datasets at 5 km
resolution based on a dense network of long series weather observations for
central-north Italy is under development (<uri>http://www.arcis.it/wp/en/home-2/</uri>, last access: 31 July 2018).</p>
      <p id="d1e1459">The circulation type classifications adopted in the operational chain were
specifically selected and calibrated for the stratification of surface
temperature and precipitation for Italy, but different types of
classifications are available in the COST 733 catalogue<?pagebreak page188?> (<uri>http://cost733.geo.uni-augsburg.de/cost733wiki/Cost733Cat2.0</uri>,
last access: 31 July 2018) for other
European countries; alternatively a selection of the most suitable
classification could be carried out for a specific region, as illustrated in
other works (Vallorani et al., 2017; Broderick and Fealy, 2014).</p>
      <p id="d1e1465">A further element of flexibility is due to the possibility to use any
conceivable numerical model all over the world, provided it runs in ensemble
mode and a suitable climatology is available. The Bayesian approach used to
produce the output maps fully maintains the probabilistic nature of the
driving ensemble global model and represents the essential link<?pagebreak page189?> to any
decision making process, such as the cost/loss model (Palmer, 2002).</p>
      <p id="d1e1468">The simplified approach, based on Eq. (2), merges the information
coming from the ensemble monthly forecast, the climatology and the
circulation type classifications into a single product. Nevertheless this
does not prevent one from evaluating separately the different sources of
uncertainty. The method appears suitable for risk assessment analysis of
extreme events strongly related to surface temperature and precipitation.
Anyway the circulation types approach can be also extended to other
variables like heat waves, cold spells, heavy precipitations or dry series,
producing estimates for the occurrence probability of extremes, possibly at
local scale and on a seasonal time horizon. The positive impact on
agriculture, water management, energy and health system is easily
understood.</p>
      <p id="d1e1472">The first preliminary test presented in this paper gives an idea of how good
can be the matching between the probabilistic output and the observed
monthly anomalies, even in case when strong anomalies occurred. As shown by
the results presented here, if the monthly circulation types are correctly
predicted, then a reliable forecast for the expected anomalies of rainy days
and surface temperature becomes possible. The uncertainty coming from the
prediction of the circulation types, as made by the ensemble seasonal
forecast, could deteriorate the final probability estimation for the
variable of interest, even in the case of highly informative climatological
circulation types. Since we have not taken into account this aspect in the
present study, further investigations on this issue are surely needed.</p>
      <p id="d1e1475">A verification procedure based on statistically consistent samples of
measurements will be carried out in the near future starting from a
retrospective seasonal forecast database (i.e. hindcasts of the ensemble
NCEP-NCAR CFSv2), over a period of at least 10 years (Nikulin et al., 2018;
Manzanas et al., 2018). Hence, the skill of the entire framework of
seasonal forecasts will be evaluated throughout a proper score, like the
logarithmic score (Benedetti, 2010) based on the relative entropy between
the observed occurrence frequencies and the predicted probabilities for the
forecasted events.</p>
</sec>

      
      </body>
    <back><notes notes-type="dataavailability">

      <p id="d1e1482">Text files of the two circulation type classifications (pct9 and san9) and the centroid values of MSLP and 500HGT
(Fig. 2) are available to the following DOI (<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.1321007" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5281/zenodo.1321007</ext-link>, Vallorani and Messeri, 2018).
The pct9 and san9 classifications were selected through a sensitivity analysis detailed in a specific study (<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1002/joc.5219" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1002/joc.5219</ext-link>, Vallorani et al., 2017).</p>
  </notes><notes notes-type="authorcontribution">

      <p id="d1e1494">GM, RB, AC and RV
conceived of the presented idea, developed the theory and performed the computations. MR and RV performed post-processing and graphical
output. BG and GM gave numerous suggestions for the methodology and encouraged our research. All authors discussed the results and
contributed to the final manuscript.</p>
  </notes><notes notes-type="competinginterests">

      <p id="d1e1500">The authors declare that they have no conflict of
interest.</p>
  </notes><notes notes-type="sistatement">

      <p id="d1e1506">This article is part of the special issue “17th EMS Annual Meeting: European Conference for
Applied Meteorology and Climatology 2017”. It is a result of the EMS Annual Meeting: European Conference for Applied Meteorology and
Climatology 2017, Dublin, Ireland, 4–8 September 2017.</p>
  </notes><ack><title>Acknowledgements</title><p id="d1e1512">A special thank full of affection, esteem and gratitude to Giampiero Maracchi for having always believed and stimulated our research on
climaology and seasonal forecasts.<?xmltex \hack{\newline}?><?xmltex \hack{\newline}?>
Edited by: Rasmus Benestad<?xmltex \hack{\newline}?>
Reviewed by: Ciaran Broderick and one anonymous referee</p></ack><ref-list>
    <title>References</title>

      <ref id="bib1.bib1"><label>1</label><mixed-citation>
Angstrom, A.: On the effectivity of weather warnings, Nordisk Statistisk
Tidskrift, 1, 394–408, 1922.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib2"><label>2</label><mixed-citation>Benedetti, R.: Scoring Rules for Forecast Verification, American
Meteorological Society, Mon. Weather Rev., 138, 203–211, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1175/2009MWR2945.1" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1175/2009MWR2945.1</ext-link>, 2010.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib3"><label>3</label><mixed-citation>Broderick, C. and Fealy R.: An analysis of the synoptic and climatological
applicability of circulation type classifications for Ireland, Int. J.
Climatol., 35, 451–505, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1002/joc.3996" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1002/joc.3996</ext-link>, 2014.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib4"><label>4</label><mixed-citation>Fernandez-Montes, S., Seubert, S., Rodrigo, F. S., Rasilla Álvarez, D. F.,
Herting, E., Esteban, P., and Philipp, A.: Circulation types and extreme
precipitation days in the Iberian Peninsula in the transition seasons:
Spatial links and temporal changes, Atmos. Res., 138, 41–58,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosres.2013.10.018" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.atmosres.2013.10.018</ext-link>, 2014.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib5"><label>5</label><mixed-citation>Haylock, M. R., Hofstra, N., Klein Tank, A. M. G., Klok, E. J., Jones P. D., and
New, M.: A European daily high-resolution gridded dataset of surface
temperature and precipitation for 1950–2006, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 113,
D20119, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2008JD10201" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2008JD10201</ext-link>, 2008.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib6"><label>6</label><mixed-citation>Huth, R., Beck, C., and Kuĉerová, M.: Synoptic-climatological
evaluation of the circulation pattern over Europe, Int. J. Climatol., 36,
2710–2726, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1002/joc.4546" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1002/joc.4546</ext-link>, 2015.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib7"><label>7</label><mixed-citation>Kanamitsu, M., Ebisuzaki, W., Woollen, J., Yang, S.-K., Hnilo, J. J., Fiorino,
M., and Potter, G. L.: NCEP-DOE AMIP-II Reanalysis (R-2), B. Am. Meteorol. Soc.,
83, 1631–1643, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1175/BAMS-83-11-1631" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1175/BAMS-83-11-1631</ext-link>, 2002.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib8"><label>8</label><mixed-citation>Kysely, J.: Influence of the persistence of circulation patterns on warm and
cold temperature anomalies in Europe: Analysis over the 20th century, Global
Planet. Change, 62, 147–163, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gloplacha.2008.01.003" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.gloplacha.2008.01.003</ext-link>, 2008.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib9"><label>9</label><mixed-citation>Leutbecher, M. and Palmer, T. N.: Ensemble forecasting, J. Comp. Phys., 227, 3515–3539, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcp.2007.02.014" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.jcp.2007.02.014</ext-link>, 2007.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib10"><label>10</label><mixed-citation>
Manzanas, R., Gutierrez, J. M., Fernandez, J., Van Meijgaard, E., Calmanti,
S., Magarino, M. E., and Cofino, A. S., and Herrera, S.: Dynamical and statistical
downscaling of seasonal temperature forecasts in Europe: Added value for
user applications, Clim. Serv., 9, 44–56, 2018.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib11"><label>11</label><mixed-citation>
Nikulin, G., Asharaf, S., Magarino, M. E., Calmanti, S., Cardoso, R. M.,
Bhend, J., Fernandez, J., Frias, M. D., Frohlich, K., Fruh, B., Garcia, S. H.,
Manzanas, R., Gutierrez, J. M., Hansson, U., Kolax, M., Liniger, M. A.,
Soares, P. M. M., Spring, C., Tome, R., and Wyser, K.: Dynamical and
statistical downscaling of a global seasonal hindcast in eastern Africa,
Clim. Serv., 9, 72–85, 2018.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib12"><label>12</label><mixed-citation>
Palmer, T. N.: The economic value of ensemble forecasts as a tool for risk
assessment: From days to decades, Q. J. Roy. Meteor. Soc., 128, 747–774,
2002.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib13"><label>13</label><mixed-citation>Philipp, A., Beck, C., Huth, R., and Jacobeit, J.: Development and
comparison of circulation type classifications using the COST 733 dataset
and software, Int. J. Climatol., 36, 2673–2691, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1002/joc.3920" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1002/joc.3920</ext-link>, 2014.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib14"><label>14</label><mixed-citation>Prudhomme, C. and Genevier, M.: Can atmospheric circulation be linked to
flooding in Europe?, Hydrol. Process., 25, 1180–1990, 2011.
 </mixed-citation></ref><?xmltex \hack{\newpage}?>
      <ref id="bib1.bib15"><label>15</label><mixed-citation>Ramos, M., Ramos, R., Sousa, P., Trigo, R. M., Janeira M., and Prior, V.:
Cloud to ground lightning activity over Portugal and its association with
circulation weather types, Atmos. Res., 101, 84–101,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosres.2011.01.014" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.atmosres.2011.01.014</ext-link>, 2011.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib16"><label>16</label><mixed-citation>Russo, S., Sillmann, J., and Fischer, E. M.: Top ten European heatwaves
since 1950 and their occurrence in the coming decades, Environ. Res. Lett.,
10, 124003, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/10/12/124003" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1088/1748-9326/10/12/124003</ext-link>, 2015.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib17"><label>17</label><mixed-citation>Vallorani, R., Bartolini, G., Betti, G., Crisci A., Gozzini B., Grifoni D.,
Iannuccilli M., Messeri A., Messeri G., Morabito M., and Maracchi G.:
Circulation type classifications for temperature and precipitation
stratification in Italy, Int. J. Climatol., 38, 915–931, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1002/joc.5219" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1002/joc.5219</ext-link>, 2017.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib18"><label>18</label><mixed-citation>Vallorani, R., Messeri, G., Crisci, A., and Iannuccilli, M.: Circulation type classifications for surface temperature and
precipitation optimized for Italy, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.1321007" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5281/zenodo.1321007</ext-link>,
2018.</mixed-citation></ref>

  </ref-list></back>
    <!--<article-title-html>A new framework for probabilistic seasonal forecasts based on circulation type classifications and driven by an ensemble global model</article-title-html>
<abstract-html><p>In the last years coupled atmospheric ocean climate
models have remarkably improved medium range seasonal forecasts, especially
on middle latitude areas such as Europe and the Mediterranean basin. In this
study a new framework for medium range seasonal forecasts is proposed. It is
based on circulation types extracted from long range global ensemble models
and it aims at two goals: (i) an easier use of the information contained in
the complex system of atmospheric circulations, through their reduction to a
limited number of circulation types and (ii) the computation of high spatial
resolution probabilistic forecasts for temperature and precipitation. The
proposed framework could be also useful to lead predictions of
weather-derived parameters, such as the risk of heavy rainfall, drought or
heat waves, with important impacts on agriculture, water management and
severe weather risk assessment. Operatively, starting from the ensemble
predictions of mean sea level pressure and geopotential height at 500&thinsp;hPa of
the NCEP – CFSv2 long range forecasts, the third-quantiles probabilistic
maps of 2&thinsp;m temperature and precipitation are computed through a Bayesian
approach by using E-OBS 0.25° gridded datasets. Two different
classification schemes with nine classes were used: (i) Principal Component
Transversal (PCT9), computed on mean sea level pressure and (ii) Simulated
Annealing Clustering (SAN9), computed on geopotential height at 500&thinsp;hPa.
Both were chosen for their best fit concerning the ground-level
precipitation and temperature stratification for the Italian peninsula.
Following this approach an operative chain based on a very flexible and
exportable method was implemented, applicable wherever spatially and
temporally consistent datasets of weather observations are available.</p><p>In this paper the model operative chain, some output examples and a first
attempt of qualitative verification are shown. In particular three case
studies (June 2003, February 2012 and July 2014) were examined, assuming
that the ensemble seasonal model correctly predicts the circulation type
occurrences. At least on this base, the framework here proposed has shown
promising performance.</p></abstract-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib1"><label>1</label><mixed-citation>
Angstrom, A.: On the effectivity of weather warnings, Nordisk Statistisk
Tidskrift, 1, 394–408, 1922.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib2"><label>2</label><mixed-citation>
Benedetti, R.: Scoring Rules for Forecast Verification, American
Meteorological Society, Mon. Weather Rev., 138, 203–211, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1175/2009MWR2945.1" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1175/2009MWR2945.1</a>, 2010.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib3"><label>3</label><mixed-citation>
Broderick, C. and Fealy R.: An analysis of the synoptic and climatological
applicability of circulation type classifications for Ireland, Int. J.
Climatol., 35, 451–505, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1002/joc.3996" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1002/joc.3996</a>, 2014.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib4"><label>4</label><mixed-citation>
Fernandez-Montes, S., Seubert, S., Rodrigo, F. S., Rasilla Álvarez, D. F.,
Herting, E., Esteban, P., and Philipp, A.: Circulation types and extreme
precipitation days in the Iberian Peninsula in the transition seasons:
Spatial links and temporal changes, Atmos. Res., 138, 41–58,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosres.2013.10.018" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosres.2013.10.018</a>, 2014.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib5"><label>5</label><mixed-citation>
Haylock, M. R., Hofstra, N., Klein Tank, A. M. G., Klok, E. J., Jones P. D., and
New, M.: A European daily high-resolution gridded dataset of surface
temperature and precipitation for 1950–2006, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 113,
D20119, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2008JD10201" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1029/2008JD10201</a>, 2008.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib6"><label>6</label><mixed-citation>
Huth, R., Beck, C., and Kuĉerová, M.: Synoptic-climatological
evaluation of the circulation pattern over Europe, Int. J. Climatol., 36,
2710–2726, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1002/joc.4546" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1002/joc.4546</a>, 2015.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib7"><label>7</label><mixed-citation>
Kanamitsu, M., Ebisuzaki, W., Woollen, J., Yang, S.-K., Hnilo, J. J., Fiorino,
M., and Potter, G. L.: NCEP-DOE AMIP-II Reanalysis (R-2), B. Am. Meteorol. Soc.,
83, 1631–1643, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1175/BAMS-83-11-1631" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1175/BAMS-83-11-1631</a>, 2002.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib8"><label>8</label><mixed-citation>
Kysely, J.: Influence of the persistence of circulation patterns on warm and
cold temperature anomalies in Europe: Analysis over the 20th century, Global
Planet. Change, 62, 147–163, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gloplacha.2008.01.003" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gloplacha.2008.01.003</a>, 2008.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib9"><label>9</label><mixed-citation>
Leutbecher, M. and Palmer, T. N.: Ensemble forecasting, J. Comp. Phys., 227, 3515–3539, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcp.2007.02.014" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcp.2007.02.014</a>, 2007.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib10"><label>10</label><mixed-citation>
Manzanas, R., Gutierrez, J. M., Fernandez, J., Van Meijgaard, E., Calmanti,
S., Magarino, M. E., and Cofino, A. S., and Herrera, S.: Dynamical and statistical
downscaling of seasonal temperature forecasts in Europe: Added value for
user applications, Clim. Serv., 9, 44–56, 2018.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib11"><label>11</label><mixed-citation>
Nikulin, G., Asharaf, S., Magarino, M. E., Calmanti, S., Cardoso, R. M.,
Bhend, J., Fernandez, J., Frias, M. D., Frohlich, K., Fruh, B., Garcia, S. H.,
Manzanas, R., Gutierrez, J. M., Hansson, U., Kolax, M., Liniger, M. A.,
Soares, P. M. M., Spring, C., Tome, R., and Wyser, K.: Dynamical and
statistical downscaling of a global seasonal hindcast in eastern Africa,
Clim. Serv., 9, 72–85, 2018.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib12"><label>12</label><mixed-citation>
Palmer, T. N.: The economic value of ensemble forecasts as a tool for risk
assessment: From days to decades, Q. J. Roy. Meteor. Soc., 128, 747–774,
2002.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib13"><label>13</label><mixed-citation>
Philipp, A., Beck, C., Huth, R., and Jacobeit, J.: Development and
comparison of circulation type classifications using the COST 733 dataset
and software, Int. J. Climatol., 36, 2673–2691, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1002/joc.3920" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1002/joc.3920</a>, 2014.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib14"><label>14</label><mixed-citation>
Prudhomme, C. and Genevier, M.: Can atmospheric circulation be linked to
flooding in Europe?, Hydrol. Process., 25, 1180–1990, 2011.

</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib15"><label>15</label><mixed-citation>
Ramos, M., Ramos, R., Sousa, P., Trigo, R. M., Janeira M., and Prior, V.:
Cloud to ground lightning activity over Portugal and its association with
circulation weather types, Atmos. Res., 101, 84–101,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosres.2011.01.014" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosres.2011.01.014</a>, 2011.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib16"><label>16</label><mixed-citation>
Russo, S., Sillmann, J., and Fischer, E. M.: Top ten European heatwaves
since 1950 and their occurrence in the coming decades, Environ. Res. Lett.,
10, 124003, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/10/12/124003" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/10/12/124003</a>, 2015.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib17"><label>17</label><mixed-citation>
Vallorani, R., Bartolini, G., Betti, G., Crisci A., Gozzini B., Grifoni D.,
Iannuccilli M., Messeri A., Messeri G., Morabito M., and Maracchi G.:
Circulation type classifications for temperature and precipitation
stratification in Italy, Int. J. Climatol., 38, 915–931, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1002/joc.5219" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1002/joc.5219</a>, 2017.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib18"><label>18</label><mixed-citation>
Vallorani, R., Messeri, G., Crisci, A., and Iannuccilli, M.: Circulation type classifications for surface temperature and
precipitation optimized for Italy, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.1321007" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.1321007</a>,
2018.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>--></article>
