27 Apr 2018
| 27 Apr 2018
Give me five! – reasons for two-way communication between experts and citizens in relation to air pollution risk
Maria Loroño-Leturiondo
CORRESPONDING AUTHOR
Science and the Environment, Manchester Metropolitan University, Manchester, M1 5GD, England, UK
Paul O'Hare
Science and the Environment, Manchester Metropolitan University, Manchester, M1 5GD, England, UK
Simon Cook
Geography, School of Social Sciences, University of Dundee, Dundee, DD1 4HN, Scotland, UK
Stephen R. Hoon
Science and the Environment, Manchester Metropolitan University, Manchester, M1 5GD, England, UK
Sam Illingworth
Science and the Environment, Manchester Metropolitan University, Manchester, M1 5GD, England, UK
Related authors
Maria Loroño-Leturiondo, Paul O'Hare, Simon J. Cook, Stephen R. Hoon, and Sam Illingworth
Geosci. Commun., 2, 39–53, https://doi.org/10.5194/gc-2-39-2019, https://doi.org/10.5194/gc-2-39-2019, 2019
Short summary
Short summary
Urban centres worldwide are adversely affected by flooding and air pollution. Effective communication between experts and citizens is key to understanding and limiting the impact of these hazards, as citizens have valuable knowledge based on their day-to-day experiences. In this study, we compare five different communication formats that can facilitate the required dialogue and explore the best ways and optimal circumstances in which these can be implemented.
Shahzad Gani, Louise Arnal, Lucy Beattie, John Hillier, Sam Illingworth, Tiziana Lanza, Solmaz Mohadjer, Karoliina Pulkkinen, Heidi Roop, Iain Stewart, Kirsten von Elverfeldt, and Stephanie Zihms
Geosci. Commun., 7, 251–266, https://doi.org/10.5194/gc-7-251-2024, https://doi.org/10.5194/gc-7-251-2024, 2024
Short summary
Short summary
Science communication in geosciences has societal and scientific value but often operates in “shadowlands”. This editorial highlights these issues and proposes potential solutions. Our objective is to create a transparent and responsible geoscience communication landscape, fostering scientific progress, the well-being of scientists, and societal benefits.
Adam Emmer, Oscar Vilca, Cesar Salazar Checa, Sihan Li, Simon Cook, Elena Pummer, Jan Hrebrina, and Wilfried Haeberli
EGUsphere, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2024-2316, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2024-2316, 2024
Short summary
Short summary
We report in detail the most recent large landslide-triggered glacial lake outburst flood (GLOF) in the Peruvian Andes (the 2023 Rasac GLOF), analyze its preconditions, consequences, and the role of changing climate. Our study contibutes to understanding GLOF occurrence patterns in space and time and corroborates increasing frequency of such events in changing mountains.
Minja Sillanpää, AnaCapri Mauro, Minttu Hänninen, Sam Illingworth, and Mo Hamza
Geosci. Commun., 7, 167–193, https://doi.org/10.5194/gc-7-167-2024, https://doi.org/10.5194/gc-7-167-2024, 2024
Short summary
Short summary
Minions of Disruptions is a climate change game designed as a communication tool for groups that do not regularly engage with the topic. In our research, we find that the game is liked by the general public because it encourages collective action. This is important because most local climate challenges can only be solved by groups and because gameplay can increase collaboration. The results of this study may be used to develop communication tools that better consider the needs of the audiences.
Sam Illingworth
Geosci. Commun., 6, 131–139, https://doi.org/10.5194/gc-6-131-2023, https://doi.org/10.5194/gc-6-131-2023, 2023
Short summary
Short summary
In this article, I explore the various ways the geosciences can be communicated to a wider audience. I focus on creative methods that range from sharing information to involving the public in the research process. By using examples from my own work and the wider literature, I demonstrate how these approaches can engage diverse communities and promote greater recognition for geoscience communication.
Caitlyn A. Hall, Sam Illingworth, Solmaz Mohadjer, Mathew Koll Roxy, Craig Poku, Frederick Otu-Larbi, Darryl Reano, Mara Freilich, Maria-Luisa Veisaga, Miguel Valencia, and Joey Morales
Geosci. Commun., 5, 275–280, https://doi.org/10.5194/gc-5-275-2022, https://doi.org/10.5194/gc-5-275-2022, 2022
Short summary
Short summary
In this manifesto, we offer six points of reflection that higher education geoscience educators can act upon to recognise and unlearn their biases and diversify the geosciences in higher education, complementing current calls for institutional and organisational change. This serves as a starting point to gather momentum to establish community-built opportunities for implementing and strengthening diversity, equity, inclusion, and justice holistically in geoscience education.
Adam Emmer, Simon K. Allen, Mark Carey, Holger Frey, Christian Huggel, Oliver Korup, Martin Mergili, Ashim Sattar, Georg Veh, Thomas Y. Chen, Simon J. Cook, Mariana Correas-Gonzalez, Soumik Das, Alejandro Diaz Moreno, Fabian Drenkhan, Melanie Fischer, Walter W. Immerzeel, Eñaut Izagirre, Ramesh Chandra Joshi, Ioannis Kougkoulos, Riamsara Kuyakanon Knapp, Dongfeng Li, Ulfat Majeed, Stephanie Matti, Holly Moulton, Faezeh Nick, Valentine Piroton, Irfan Rashid, Masoom Reza, Anderson Ribeiro de Figueiredo, Christian Riveros, Finu Shrestha, Milan Shrestha, Jakob Steiner, Noah Walker-Crawford, Joanne L. Wood, and Jacob C. Yde
Nat. Hazards Earth Syst. Sci., 22, 3041–3061, https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-22-3041-2022, https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-22-3041-2022, 2022
Short summary
Short summary
Glacial lake outburst floods (GLOFs) have attracted increased research attention recently. In this work, we review GLOF research papers published between 2017 and 2021 and complement the analysis with research community insights gained from the 2021 GLOF conference we organized. The transdisciplinary character of the conference together with broad geographical coverage allowed us to identify progress, trends and challenges in GLOF research and outline future research needs and directions.
Alice Wardle and Sam Illingworth
Geosci. Commun., 5, 221–225, https://doi.org/10.5194/gc-5-221-2022, https://doi.org/10.5194/gc-5-221-2022, 2022
Short summary
Short summary
Participants answered four questions concerning their experience writing a haiku based on a geoscience extract. Data were categorised as being part of the
Task Processor
Task Meaning. The themes involved in the
Task Processwere
Identification of significant information,
Distillation of informationand
Metamorphosis of text, while the themes related to
Task Meaningwere made up of
Enjoyable,
Challenging(which has sub-themes
Frustratingand
Restricted) and
Valuable.
John K. Hillier, Katharine E. Welsh, Mathew Stiller-Reeve, Rebecca K. Priestley, Heidi A. Roop, Tiziana Lanza, and Sam Illingworth
Geosci. Commun., 4, 493–506, https://doi.org/10.5194/gc-4-493-2021, https://doi.org/10.5194/gc-4-493-2021, 2021
Short summary
Short summary
In this editorial we expand upon the brief advice in the first editorial of Geoscience Communication (Illingworth et al., 2018), illustrating what constitutes robust and publishable work for this journal and elucidating its key elements. Our aim is to help geoscience communicators plan a route to publication and to illustrate how good engagement work that is already being done might be developed into publishable research.
Hazel Gibson, Sam Illingworth, and Susanne Buiter
Geosci. Commun., 4, 437–451, https://doi.org/10.5194/gc-4-437-2021, https://doi.org/10.5194/gc-4-437-2021, 2021
Short summary
Short summary
In the spring of 2020, in response to the escalating global COVID-19 Coronavirus pandemic, the European Geosciences Union (EGU) moved its annual General Assembly online in a matter of weeks. This paper explores the feedback provided by participants who attended this experimental conference and identifies four key themes that emerged from analysis of the survey (connection, engagement, environment, and accessibility). The responses raise important questions about the format of future conferences.
Arianna Soldati and Sam Illingworth
Geosci. Commun., 3, 73–87, https://doi.org/10.5194/gc-3-73-2020, https://doi.org/10.5194/gc-3-73-2020, 2020
Short summary
Short summary
In this study we investigate what poetry written about volcanoes from the 1800s to the present day reveals about the relationship between humanity and volcanoes, including how it evolved over that time frame. This analysis reveals that the human–volcano relationship is especially centred around the sense of identity that volcanoes provide to humans, which may follow from both positive and negative events, and has a spiritual element to it.
Jonathan P. Tennant, Sam Illingworth, Iain Stewart, and Kirsten von Elverfeldt
Geosci. Commun., 3, 71–72, https://doi.org/10.5194/gc-3-71-2020, https://doi.org/10.5194/gc-3-71-2020, 2020
Sam Illingworth
Geosci. Commun., 3, 35–47, https://doi.org/10.5194/gc-3-35-2020, https://doi.org/10.5194/gc-3-35-2020, 2020
Short summary
Short summary
To many non-specialists, the science behind climate change can appear confusing and alienating, yet in order for global mitigation efforts to be successful it is not just scientists who need to take action, but rather society as a whole. This study shows how poets and poetry offer a method of communicating the science of climate change to the wider society
using language that they not only better understand, but which also has the potential to stimulate accountability and inspire action.
Rolf Hut, Casper Albers, Sam Illingworth, and Chris Skinner
Geosci. Commun., 2, 117–124, https://doi.org/10.5194/gc-2-117-2019, https://doi.org/10.5194/gc-2-117-2019, 2019
Short summary
Short summary
Game worlds in modern computer games, while they include very Earth-like landscapes, are ultimately fake. Since games can be used for learning, we wondered if people pick up wrong information from games. Using a survey we tested if people with a background in geoscience are better than people without such a background at distinguishing if game landscapes are realistic. We found that geoscientists are significantly better at this, but the difference is small and overall everyone is good at it.
Maria Loroño-Leturiondo, Paul O'Hare, Simon J. Cook, Stephen R. Hoon, and Sam Illingworth
Geosci. Commun., 2, 39–53, https://doi.org/10.5194/gc-2-39-2019, https://doi.org/10.5194/gc-2-39-2019, 2019
Short summary
Short summary
Urban centres worldwide are adversely affected by flooding and air pollution. Effective communication between experts and citizens is key to understanding and limiting the impact of these hazards, as citizens have valuable knowledge based on their day-to-day experiences. In this study, we compare five different communication formats that can facilitate the required dialogue and explore the best ways and optimal circumstances in which these can be implemented.
Sam Illingworth, Alice Bell, Stuart Capstick, Adam Corner, Piers Forster, Rosie Leigh, Maria Loroño Leturiondo, Catherine Muller, Harriett Richardson, and Emily Shuckburgh
Geosci. Commun., 1, 9–24, https://doi.org/10.5194/gc-1-9-2018, https://doi.org/10.5194/gc-1-9-2018, 2018
Short summary
Short summary
Climate change is real, it is happening now, and it will not be stopped by the sole efforts of scientists. This study shows how poetry and open conversation can be used to develop a dialogue around mitigating climate change with different communities, including faith groups and people living with disabilities. Furthermore, it shows how this dialogue can help us to better understand the opportunities that these communities present in tackling the negative effects of human-made climate change.
Sam Illingworth, Iain Stewart, Jonathan Tennant, and Kirsten von Elverfeldt
Geosci. Commun., 1, 1–7, https://doi.org/10.5194/gc-1-1-2018, https://doi.org/10.5194/gc-1-1-2018, 2018
Short summary
Short summary
Welcome to the journal of Geoscience Communication! We decided to write this editorial in order to introduce ourselves (the executive editors of GC), to provide a history of its development, and to serve as a guideline for future authors who wish to submit to this journal. We hope that this article serves as a useful aid for people who are considering publishing in GC, as well as the wider geoscience community, and that it can act in the first instance as a FAQ for authors, editors, and readers alike.
G. Allen, S. M. Illingworth, S. J. O'Shea, S. Newman, A. Vance, S. J.-B. Bauguitte, F. Marenco, J. Kent, K. Bower, M. W. Gallagher, J. Muller, C. J. Percival, C. Harlow, J. Lee, and J. P. Taylor
Atmos. Meas. Tech., 7, 4401–4416, https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-7-4401-2014, https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-7-4401-2014, 2014
Short summary
Short summary
This paper presents a validated method and data set for new retrievals of trace gas concentrations and temperature from the ARIES infrared spectrometer instrument on the UK Atmospheric Research Aircraft (www.faam.ac.uk). This new capability for the aircraft will allow new science to be done because of the way it can sense information about the atmosphere without having to physically pass through it (remote sensing). This will allow us to better understand the make-up of the lower atmosphere.
S. J. O'Shea, G. Allen, M. W. Gallagher, K. Bower, S. M. Illingworth, J. B. A. Muller, B. T. Jones, C. J. Percival, S. J-B. Bauguitte, M. Cain, N. Warwick, A. Quiquet, U. Skiba, J. Drewer, K. Dinsmore, E. G. Nisbet, D. Lowry, R. E. Fisher, J. L. France, M. Aurela, A. Lohila, G. Hayman, C. George, D. B. Clark, A. J. Manning, A. D. Friend, and J. Pyle
Atmos. Chem. Phys., 14, 13159–13174, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-14-13159-2014, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-14-13159-2014, 2014
Short summary
Short summary
This paper presents airborne measurements of greenhouse gases collected in the European Arctic. Regional scale flux estimates for the northern Scandinavian wetlands are derived. These fluxes are found to be in excellent agreement with coincident surface measurements within the aircraft's sampling domain. This has allowed a significant low bias to be identified in two commonly used process-based land surface models.
S. M. Illingworth, G. Allen, S. Newman, A. Vance, F. Marenco, R. C. Harlow, J. Taylor, D. P. Moore, and J. J. Remedios
Atmos. Meas. Tech., 7, 1133–1150, https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-7-1133-2014, https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-7-1133-2014, 2014
S. J. O'Shea, G. Allen, M. W. Gallagher, S. J.-B. Bauguitte, S. M. Illingworth, M. Le Breton, J. B. A. Muller, C. J. Percival, A. T. Archibald, D. E. Oram, M. Parrington, P. I. Palmer, and A. C. Lewis
Atmos. Chem. Phys., 13, 12451–12467, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-13-12451-2013, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-13-12451-2013, 2013
Cited articles
Arnstein, S. R.: A Ladder of Citizen Participation, J. American Inst. Plan.,
35, 216–224, https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-1321-5_10, 1969.
Bickerstaff, K.: Risk perception research: socio-cultural perspectives on the
public experience of air pollution, Environ. Int., 30, 827–840, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envint.2003.12.001, 2004.
Bickerstaff, K. and Walker, G.: Public understandings of air pollution: the
`localisation' of environmental risk, Global Environ. Change, 11, 133–145,
https://doi.org/10.1016/S0959-3780(00)00063-7, 2001.
Bowater, L. and Yeoman, K.: Science Communication: A Practical Guide for
Scientists, 1st Edn., Wiley-Blackwell, Chichester, 2012.
Bultitude, K.: The Why and How of Science Communication, edited by: Rosulek,
P., Science Commun. Eur. Comm., Pilsen, 2011.
Burningham, K., Fielding, J., and Thrush, D.: `It'll never happen to me':
understanding public awareness of local flood risk, Disasters, 32, 216–238,
https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-7717.2007.01036.x, 2008.
Cacciatore, M. A., Scheufele, D. A., and Iyengar, S.: The End of Framing as we
Know it …and the Future of Media Effects, Mass Commun. Soc., 19, 7–23,
https://doi.org/10.1080/15205436.2015.1068811, 2016.
Corner, A., Shaw, C., and Clarke, J.: Principles for effective communication
and public engagement on climate change: A Handbook for IPCC authors,
available at: https://climateoutreach.org/resources/ipcc-communications-handbook/
(last access: 3 February 2018), 2018.
Festinger, L.: A Theory of Cognitive Dissonance, Stanford University Press., Stanford, 1962.
Goodwin, J. and Dahlstrom, M. F.: Communication strategies for earning trust in
climate change debates, Wiley Interdiscip. Rev. Clim. Change, 5, 151–160,
https://doi.org/10.1002/wcc.262, 2014.
Groulx, M., Brisbois, M. C., Lemieux, C. J., Winegardner, A., and Fishback, L.:
A Role for Nature-Based Citizen Science in Promoting Individual and Collective
Climate Change Action? A Systematic Review of Learning Outcomes, Sci. Commun.,
39, 45–76, https://doi.org/10.1177/1075547016688324, 2017.
Harre, D. N.: Psychology for a Better World: Strategies to Inspire Sustainability,
University of Auckland, Department of Psychology, Auckland, NZ, 2011.
Illingworth, S. and Allen, G.: Effective Science Communication A practical guide
to surviving as a scientist, IOP Publishing, Bristol, England, 2016.
Illingworth, S. and Jack, K.: Rhyme and reason-using poetry to talk to
underserved audiences about environmental change, Clim. Risk Manage., 19,
120–129, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.crm.2018.01.001, 2018.
ISO 31000:2018: Risk management – Principles and guidelines, International
Organization for Standardization, Geneva, Switzerland, 2018.
Kay, S., Zhao, B., and Sui, D.: Can Social Media Clear the Air? A Case Study of
the Air Pollution Problem in Chinese Cities, Prof. Geogr., 67, 351–363,
https://doi.org/10.1080/00330124.2014.970838, 2015.
Lo, A. Y., Alexander, K. S., Proctor, W., and Ryan, A.: Reciprocity as
deliberative capacity: Lessons from a citizen's deliberation on carbon pricing
mechanisms in Australia, Environ. Plan. C, 31, 444–459, https://doi.org/10.1068/c11192, 2013.
Longnecker, N.: An integrated model of science communication – More than
providing evidence, J. Sci. Commun., 15, Y01, 2016.
Lorenzoni, I., Nicholson-Cole, S., and Whitmarsh, L.: Barriers perceived to
engaging with climate change among the UK public and their policy implications,
Global Environ. Change, 17, 445–459, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2007.01.004, 2007.
McCormick, S.: After the cap: Risk assessment, citizen science and disaster
recovery, Ecol. Soc., 17, 31, https://doi.org/10.5751/ES-05263-170431, 2012.
Miller, S.: Public understanding of science at the crossroads, Publ. Underst.
Sci., 10, 115–120, https://doi.org/10.1088/0963-6625/10/1/308, 2001.
Muller, C. l., Chapman, L., Johnston, S., Kidd, C., Illingworth, S., Foody, G.,
Overeem, A., and Leigh, R. r.: Crowdsourcing for climate and atmospheric sciences:
current status and future potential, Int. J. Climatol., 35, 3185–3203,
https://doi.org/10.1002/joc.4210, 2015.
Ngo, N. S., Kokoyo, S., and Klopp, J.: Why participation matters for air quality
studies: risk perceptions, understandings of air pollution and mobilization in
a poor neighborhood in Nairobi, Kenya, Public Health, 142, 177–185,
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.puhe.2015.07.014, 2017.
Priest, S.: Communicating Climate Change – The Path Forward, edited by:
Priest, S. and Macmillan, P., available at: http://www.palgrave.com/gp/book/9781137585783
(last access: 24 January 2018), 2016.
Rogers, E. M.: Diffusion of Innovations, 5th Edn., Free Press, New York, London,
Toronto, Sydney, 2003.
Shannon, C. E. and Weaver, W.: The Mathematical Theory of Communication,
University of Illinois Press, Urbana, 1998.
Sîrbu, A., Becker, M., Caminiti, S., De Baets, B., Elen, B., Francis, L.,
Gravino, P., Hotho, A., Ingarra, S., Loreto, V., Molino, A., Mueller, J., Peters,
J., Ricchiuti, F., Saracino, F., Servedio, V. D. P., Stumme, G., Theunis, J.,
Tria, F., and Van Den Bossche, J.: Participatory patterns in an international
air quality monitoring initiative, Plos One, 10, e0136763, https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0136763, 2015.
Walker, G., Simmons, P., Irwin, A., and Wynne, B.: Public Perception of Risks
Associated with Major Accident Hazards, HSE Books, available at:
https://ueaeprints.uea.ac.uk/49377/ (last access: 2 February 2018), 1998.
Whatmore, S. J. and Landström, C.: Flood apprentices: an exercise in making
things public, Econ. Soc., 40, 582–610, https://doi.org/10.1080/03085147.2011.602540, 2011.
WHO – World Health Organization: WHO releases country estimates on air pollution
exposure and health impact, available at: http://www.who.int/mediacentre/news/releases/2016/air-pollution-estimates/en/
(last access: 19 December 2017), 2016.
Wilsdon, J. and Willis, R.: See-through science: why public engagement needs
to move upstream, Demos, London, 2004.
Xu, J., Chi, C. S. F., and Zhu, K.: Concern or apathy: the attitude of the
public toward urban air pollution, J. Risk Res., 20, 482–498, https://doi.org/10.1080/13669877.2015.1071869, 2017.
Zhang, M. W. B., Ho, C. S. H., Fang, P., Lu, Y., and Ho, R. C. M.: Usage of
social media and smartphone application in assessment of physical and
psychological well-being of individuals in times of a major air pollution crisis,
J. Med. Internet Res., 2, e16, https://doi.org/10.2196/mhealth.2827, 2014.
Short summary
Globally we are facing both an air quality crisis and a communication emergency. Communication efforts so far have been based on a one-way provision of information from experts to society, and have arguably failed in their mission to foster a more engaged society, or to result in cleaner air. This paper supports the case for moving away from one-way communication, and identifies five benefits of a practical two-way communication between experts and citizens in order to engender positive change.
Globally we are facing both an air quality crisis and a communication emergency. Communication...
