Articles | Volume 14
https://doi.org/10.5194/asr-14-181-2017
https://doi.org/10.5194/asr-14-181-2017
21 Jun 2017
 | 21 Jun 2017

Validation of gas phase chemistry in the WRF-Chem model over Europe

Jan Karlický, Peter Huszár, and Tomáš Halenka

Related authors

FUME 2.0 – Flexible Universal processor for Modeling Emissions
Michal Belda, Nina Benešová, Jaroslav Resler, Peter Huszár, Ondřej Vlček, Pavel Krč, Jan Karlický, Pavel Juruš, and Kryštof Eben
Geosci. Model Dev., 17, 3867–3878, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-17-3867-2024,https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-17-3867-2024, 2024
Short summary
Impact of urbanization on fine particulate matter concentrations over central Europe
Peter Huszar, Alvaro Patricio Prieto Perez​​​​​​​, Lukáš Bartík, Jan Karlický, and Anahi Villalba-Pradas
Atmos. Chem. Phys., 24, 397–425, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-24-397-2024,https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-24-397-2024, 2024
Short summary
Modelling the European wind-blown dust emissions and their impact on particulate matter (PM) concentrations
Marina Liaskoni, Peter Huszar, Lukáš Bartík, Alvaro Patricio Prieto Perez, Jan Karlický, and Ondřej Vlček
Atmos. Chem. Phys., 23, 3629–3654, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-23-3629-2023,https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-23-3629-2023, 2023
Short summary
Impact of urbanization on gas-phase pollutant concentrations: a regional-scale, model-based analysis of the contributing factors
Peter Huszar, Jan Karlický, Lukáš Bartík, Marina Liaskoni, Alvaro Patricio Prieto Perez, and Kateřina Šindelářová
Atmos. Chem. Phys., 22, 12647–12674, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-22-12647-2022,https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-22-12647-2022, 2022
Short summary
High-resolution biogenic global emission inventory for the time period 2000–2019 for air quality modelling
Katerina Sindelarova, Jana Markova, David Simpson, Peter Huszar, Jan Karlicky, Sabine Darras, and Claire Granier
Earth Syst. Sci. Data, 14, 251–270, https://doi.org/10.5194/essd-14-251-2022,https://doi.org/10.5194/essd-14-251-2022, 2022
Short summary

Cited articles

Balzarini, A., Pirovano, G., Honzak, L., Žabkar, R., Curci, G., Forkel, R., Hirtl, M., José, R. S., Tuccella, P., and Grell, G.: WRF-Chem model sensitivity to chemical mechanisms choice in reconstructing aerosol optical properties, Atmos. Environ., 115, 604–619, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2014.12.033, 2015.
Chen, F. and Dudhia, J.: Coupling an Advanced Land Surface–Hydrology Model with the Penn State–NCAR MM5 Modeling System. Part I: Model Implementation and Sensitivity, Mon. Weather Rev., 129, 569–585, 10.1175/1520-0493(2001)129<0569:CAALSH>2.0.CO;2, 2001.
Chou, M.-D. and Suarez, M. J.: Solar Radiation Parameterization (CLIRAD-SW) for Atmospheric Studies, NASA/TM-1999-104606, 15, 1999.
Emmons, L. K., Walters, S., Hess, P. G., Lamarque, J.-F., Pfister, G. G., Fillmore, D., Granier, C., Guenther, A., Kinnison, D., Laepple, T., Orlando, J., Tie, X., Tyndall, G., Wiedinmyer, C., Baughcum, S. L., and Kloster, S.: Description and evaluation of the Model for Ozone and Related chemical Tracers, version 4 (MOZART-4), Geoscientific Model Development, 3, 43–67, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-3-43-2010, 2010.
Download
Short summary
The article describes ability of the numerical atmospheric model WRF-Chem to predict concentrations of main gas pollutants over Europe. Model experiments showed that daily and annual cycles of ozone are well captured, but the model concentrations of nitride dioxide and sulfur dioxide are significantly lower than measured values. The differences between two chemical modules are significant in term of ozone daily cycle, not in the total amount of nitride and sulfur dioxide.