Articles | Volume 14
https://doi.org/10.5194/asr-14-271-2017
https://doi.org/10.5194/asr-14-271-2017
11 Aug 2017
 | 11 Aug 2017

Comparison between 3D-Var and 4D-Var data assimilation methods for the simulation of a heavy rainfall case in central Italy

Vincenzo Mazzarella, Ida Maiello, Vincenzo Capozzi, Giorgio Budillon, and Rossella Ferretti

Viewed

Total article views: 3,066 (including HTML, PDF, and XML)
HTML PDF XML Total BibTeX EndNote
1,478 1,460 128 3,066 146 142
  • HTML: 1,478
  • PDF: 1,460
  • XML: 128
  • Total: 3,066
  • BibTeX: 146
  • EndNote: 142
Views and downloads (calculated since 11 Aug 2017)
Cumulative views and downloads (calculated since 11 Aug 2017)

Viewed (geographical distribution)

Total article views: 2,946 (including HTML, PDF, and XML) Thereof 2,932 with geography defined and 14 with unknown origin.
Country # Views %
  • 1
1
 
 
 
 

Cited

Latest update: 05 Nov 2024
Download
Short summary
This work aims to provide a comparison between three dimensional and four dimensional variational data assimilation methods (3D-Var and 4D-Var) for a heavy rainfall case in central Italy. Nine simulations are compared in terms of rainfall forecast and precipitation measured by the gauges through three statistical indicators. The assimilation of conventional observations with 4D-Var method improves the quantitative precipitation forecast (QPF) compared to 3D-Var.