TITAN automatic spatial quality control of meteorological in-situ observations
Line Båserud
CORRESPONDING AUTHOR
Norwegian Meteorological Institute, Oslo, Norway
Cristian Lussana
Norwegian Meteorological Institute, Oslo, Norway
Thomas N. Nipen
Norwegian Meteorological Institute, Oslo, Norway
Ivar A. Seierstad
Norwegian Meteorological Institute, Oslo, Norway
Louise Oram
Norwegian Meteorological Institute, Oslo, Norway
Trygve Aspelien
Norwegian Meteorological Institute, Oslo, Norway
Related authors
No articles found.
John Bjørnar Bremnes, Thomas N. Nipen, and Ivar A. Seierstad
Nonlin. Processes Geophys., 31, 247–257, https://doi.org/10.5194/npg-31-247-2024, https://doi.org/10.5194/npg-31-247-2024, 2024
Short summary
Short summary
During the last 2 years, tremendous progress has been made in global data-driven weather models trained on reanalysis data. In this study, the Pangu-Weather model is compared to several numerical weather prediction models with and without probabilistic post-processing for temperature and wind speed forecasting. The results confirm that global data-driven models are promising for operational weather forecasting and that post-processing can improve these forecasts considerably.
Cristian Lussana, Emma Baietti, Line Båserud, Thomas Nils Nipen, and Ivar Ambjørn Seierstad
Adv. Sci. Res., 20, 35–48, https://doi.org/10.5194/asr-20-35-2023, https://doi.org/10.5194/asr-20-35-2023, 2023
Short summary
Short summary
We have compared hourly precipitation totals measured by rain gauges installed and maintained by citizens against professional weather stations managed by the national weather services of Finland, Norway and Sweden. The manufacturer of the citizen rain gauges is Netatmo. Despite the heterogeneity of citizens' measurements, our results show that the two data sources are comparable with each other, though with some limitations. The results also show how to improve the accuracy of citizens' data.
Cristian Lussana, Thomas N. Nipen, Ivar A. Seierstad, and Christoffer A. Elo
Nonlin. Processes Geophys., 28, 61–91, https://doi.org/10.5194/npg-28-61-2021, https://doi.org/10.5194/npg-28-61-2021, 2021
Short summary
Short summary
An unprecedented amount of rainfall data is available nowadays, such as ensemble model output, weather radar estimates, and in situ observations from networks of both traditional and opportunistic sensors. Nevertheless, the exact amount of precipitation, to some extent, eludes our knowledge. The objective of our study is precipitation reconstruction through the combination of numerical model outputs with observations from multiple data sources.
Cristian Lussana, Ole Einar Tveito, Andreas Dobler, and Ketil Tunheim
Earth Syst. Sci. Data, 11, 1531–1551, https://doi.org/10.5194/essd-11-1531-2019, https://doi.org/10.5194/essd-11-1531-2019, 2019
Short summary
Short summary
seNorge_2018 is a collection of observational gridded datasets for daily total precipitation and daily mean, minimum, and maximum temperature for the Norwegian mainland covering the time period from 1957 to the present day. The fields have 1 km of grid spacing. The data are used for applications in climatology, hydrology, and meteorology. seNorge_2018 provides a "gridded truth", especially in data-dense regions. The uncertainty increases with decreasing data density.
Cristian Lussana, Tuomo Saloranta, Thomas Skaugen, Jan Magnusson, Ole Einar Tveito, and Jess Andersen
Earth Syst. Sci. Data, 10, 235–249, https://doi.org/10.5194/essd-10-235-2018, https://doi.org/10.5194/essd-10-235-2018, 2018
Short summary
Short summary
The observational gridded climate datasets are among the primary sources of information for climate analysis and monitoring. The seNorge2 high-resolution dataset of daily total precipitation (1957–2017) constitutes a valuable meteorological input for snow and hydrological simulations which are routinely conducted over Norway for research and to support operational applications for civil protection purposes. The dataset and the seNorge2 software are publicly available for download.
F. Uboldi, A. N. Sulis, C. Lussana, M. Cislaghi, and M. Russo
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 18, 981–995, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-18-981-2014, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-18-981-2014, 2014
C. Lussana
Adv. Sci. Res., 10, 59–64, https://doi.org/10.5194/asr-10-59-2013, https://doi.org/10.5194/asr-10-59-2013, 2013
Cited articles
Anderson, A. R. S., Chapman, M., Drobot, S. D., Tadesse, A., Lambi, B., Wiener, G., and Pisano, P.: Quality of mobile air temperature and atmospheric
pressure observations from the 2010 development test environment experiment, J. Appl. Meteorol. Clim., 51, 691–701, https://doi.org/10.1175/JAMC-D-11-0126.1, 2012. a
Anderson, A. R. S., Walker, C. L., Wiener, G., Iii, W. P. M., and Haupt, S. E.: Transportation Research Interdisciplinary Perspectives An adaptive big data weather system for surface transportation, Transport. Res. Interdisciplin. Perspect., 3, 100071, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trip.2019.100071, 2019. a
Bell, S., Cornford, D., and Bastin, L.: How good are citizen weather stations? Addressing a biased opinion, Weather, 70, 75–84, https://doi.org/10.1002/wea.2316, 2015. a
Chapman, L., Bell, C., and Bell, S.: Can the crowdsourcing data paradigm take
atmospheric science to a new level? A case study of the urban heat island of
London quantified using Netatmo weather stations, Int. J. Climatol., 37, 3597–3605, https://doi.org/10.1002/joc.4940, 2017. a
De Vos, L., Leijnse, H., Overeem, A., and Uijlenhoet, R.: The potential of urban rainfall monitoring with crowdsourced automatic weather stations in Amsterdam, Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 21, 765–777, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-21-765-2017, 2017. a
De Vos, L., Droste, A. M., Zander, M. J., Overeem, A., Leijnse, H., Heusinkveld, B. G., Steeneveld, G. J., and Uijlenhoet, R.: Hydrometeorological monitoring using
opportunistic sensing networks in the Amsterdam metropolitan area, B. Am. Meteorol. Soc., 101, E167–E185, https://doi.org/10.1175/BAMS-D-19-0091.1, in press, 2019a. a
De Vos, L. W., Leijnse, H., Overeem, A., and Uijlenhoet, R.: Quality Control
for Crowdsourced Personal Weather Stations to Enable Operational Rainfall
Monitoring, Geophys. Res. Lett., 46, 8820–8829, https://doi.org/10.1029/2019GL083731, 2019b. a
Erdin, R., Frei, C., and Künsch, H. R.: Data transformation and uncertainty in geostatistical combination of radar and rain gauges, J.
Hydrometeorol., 13, 1332–1346, 2012. a
Førland, E., Allerup, P., Dahlström, B., Elomaa, E., Jónsson, T.,
Madsen, H., Perälä, J., Rissanen, P., Vedin, H., and Vejen, F.:
Manual for operational correction of Nordic precipitation data, DNMI report
Nr. 24/96, DNMI, Norway, 1996. a
Frei, C.: Interpolation of temperature in a mountainous region using nonlinear profiles and non-Euclidean distances, Int. J. Climatol., 34, 1585–1605, https://doi.org/10.1002/joc.3786, 2014. a
Frogner, I.-L., Singleton, A. T., Køltzow, M. Ø., and Andrae, U.:
Convection-permitting ensembles: challenges related to their design and use, Q. J. Roy. Meteorol. Soc., 145, 90–106, https://doi.org/10.1002/qj.3525, 2019. a
Gandin, L. S.: Complex quality control of meteorological observations, Mon. Wea. Rev., 116, 1137–1156, https://doi.org/10.1175/1520-0493(1988)116<1137:CQCOMO>2.0.CO;2, 1988. a
Gandin, L. S. and Hardin, R.: Objective analysis of meteorological fields, in: vol. 242, Israel program for scientific translations, Jerusalem, 1965. a
Lanzante, J. R.: Resistant, robust and non-parametric techniques for the
analysis of climate data: theory and examples, including applications to
historical radiosonde station data, Int. J. Climatol., 16, 1197–1226, 1996. a
Lussana, C., Uboldi, F., and Salvati, M. R.: A spatial consistency test for
surface observations from mesoscale meteorological networks, Q. J. Roy. Meteorol. Soc., 136, 1075–1088, https://doi.org/10.1002/qj.622, 2010. a
Lussana, C., Seierstad, I. A., Nipen, T. N., and Cantarello, L.: Spatial
interpolation of two-metre temperature over Norway based on the combination
of numerical weather prediction ensembles and in situ observations, Q. J. Roy. Meteorol. Soc., 145, 3626–3643, https://doi.org/10.1002/qj.3646, 2019. a
Lussana, C., Nipen, T. N., Båserud, L., Seierstad, I. A. , Oram, L., and Aspelien, T.: metno/TITAN: version 2.1.1 (Version 2.1.1), Zenodo, https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.3667625, 14 February 2020. a
Meier, F., Fenner, D., Grassmann, T., Otto, M., and Scherer, D.: Crowdsourcing air temperature from citizen weather stations for urban climate research, Urban Climate, 19, 170–191, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.uclim.2017.01.006, 2017. a
Napoly, A., Grassmann, T., Meier, F., and Fenner, D.: Development and
Application of a Statistically-Based Quality Control for Crowdsourced Air
Temperature Data, Front. Earth Sci., 6, 1–16, https://doi.org/10.3389/feart.2018.00118, 2018. a
Nipen, T. N., Seierstad, I. A., Lussana, C., Kristiansen, J., and Hov, Ø.:
Adopting citizen observations in operational weather prediction, B. Am. Meteorol. Soc., 101, E43–E57, https://doi.org/10.1175/BAMS-D-18-0237.1, 2019. a, b, c, d
Tian, Y., Huffman, G. J., Adler, R. F., Tang, L., Sapiano, M., Maggioni, V.,
and Wu, H.: Modeling errors in daily precipitation measurements: Additive or
multiplicative?, Geophys. Res. Lett., 40, 2060–2065, 2013. a
Wolff, M. A., Isaksen, K., Petersen-Øverleir, A., Ødemark, K., Reitan,
T., and Brækkan, R.: Derivation of a new continuous adjustment function
for correcting wind-induced loss of solid precipitation: results of a Norwegian field study, Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 19, 951–967,
https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-19-951-2015, 2015. a
Short summary
We present the open source project Titan for automatic quality control of meteorological in-situ observations. The quality control strategy adopted is a sequence of tests, where several of them utilize the expected spatial consistency between nearby observations.
Titan serves real-time operational applications that process massive amounts of observations measured by networks of automatic weather stations. Further developments include transforming Titan into a more flexible library of functions.
We present the open source project Titan for automatic quality control of meteorological in-situ...