Exploratory analysis of citizen observations of hourly precipitation over Scandinavia
The Norwegian Meteorological Institute, Oslo, Norway
Emma Baietti
Università di Bologna, Bologna, Italy
Line Båserud
The Norwegian Meteorological Institute, Oslo, Norway
Thomas Nils Nipen
The Norwegian Meteorological Institute, Oslo, Norway
Ivar Ambjørn Seierstad
The Norwegian Meteorological Institute, Oslo, Norway
Related authors
Cristian Lussana, Thomas N. Nipen, Ivar A. Seierstad, and Christoffer A. Elo
Nonlin. Processes Geophys., 28, 61–91, https://doi.org/10.5194/npg-28-61-2021, https://doi.org/10.5194/npg-28-61-2021, 2021
Short summary
Short summary
An unprecedented amount of rainfall data is available nowadays, such as ensemble model output, weather radar estimates, and in situ observations from networks of both traditional and opportunistic sensors. Nevertheless, the exact amount of precipitation, to some extent, eludes our knowledge. The objective of our study is precipitation reconstruction through the combination of numerical model outputs with observations from multiple data sources.
Line Båserud, Cristian Lussana, Thomas N. Nipen, Ivar A. Seierstad, Louise Oram, and Trygve Aspelien
Adv. Sci. Res., 17, 153–163, https://doi.org/10.5194/asr-17-153-2020, https://doi.org/10.5194/asr-17-153-2020, 2020
Short summary
Short summary
We present the open source project Titan for automatic quality control of meteorological in-situ observations. The quality control strategy adopted is a sequence of tests, where several of them utilize the expected spatial consistency between nearby observations.
Titan serves real-time operational applications that process massive amounts of observations measured by networks of automatic weather stations. Further developments include transforming Titan into a more flexible library of functions.
Cristian Lussana, Ole Einar Tveito, Andreas Dobler, and Ketil Tunheim
Earth Syst. Sci. Data, 11, 1531–1551, https://doi.org/10.5194/essd-11-1531-2019, https://doi.org/10.5194/essd-11-1531-2019, 2019
Short summary
Short summary
seNorge_2018 is a collection of observational gridded datasets for daily total precipitation and daily mean, minimum, and maximum temperature for the Norwegian mainland covering the time period from 1957 to the present day. The fields have 1 km of grid spacing. The data are used for applications in climatology, hydrology, and meteorology. seNorge_2018 provides a "gridded truth", especially in data-dense regions. The uncertainty increases with decreasing data density.
Cristian Lussana, Tuomo Saloranta, Thomas Skaugen, Jan Magnusson, Ole Einar Tveito, and Jess Andersen
Earth Syst. Sci. Data, 10, 235–249, https://doi.org/10.5194/essd-10-235-2018, https://doi.org/10.5194/essd-10-235-2018, 2018
Short summary
Short summary
The observational gridded climate datasets are among the primary sources of information for climate analysis and monitoring. The seNorge2 high-resolution dataset of daily total precipitation (1957–2017) constitutes a valuable meteorological input for snow and hydrological simulations which are routinely conducted over Norway for research and to support operational applications for civil protection purposes. The dataset and the seNorge2 software are publicly available for download.
F. Uboldi, A. N. Sulis, C. Lussana, M. Cislaghi, and M. Russo
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 18, 981–995, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-18-981-2014, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-18-981-2014, 2014
C. Lussana
Adv. Sci. Res., 10, 59–64, https://doi.org/10.5194/asr-10-59-2013, https://doi.org/10.5194/asr-10-59-2013, 2013
Cristian Lussana, Thomas N. Nipen, Ivar A. Seierstad, and Christoffer A. Elo
Nonlin. Processes Geophys., 28, 61–91, https://doi.org/10.5194/npg-28-61-2021, https://doi.org/10.5194/npg-28-61-2021, 2021
Short summary
Short summary
An unprecedented amount of rainfall data is available nowadays, such as ensemble model output, weather radar estimates, and in situ observations from networks of both traditional and opportunistic sensors. Nevertheless, the exact amount of precipitation, to some extent, eludes our knowledge. The objective of our study is precipitation reconstruction through the combination of numerical model outputs with observations from multiple data sources.
Line Båserud, Cristian Lussana, Thomas N. Nipen, Ivar A. Seierstad, Louise Oram, and Trygve Aspelien
Adv. Sci. Res., 17, 153–163, https://doi.org/10.5194/asr-17-153-2020, https://doi.org/10.5194/asr-17-153-2020, 2020
Short summary
Short summary
We present the open source project Titan for automatic quality control of meteorological in-situ observations. The quality control strategy adopted is a sequence of tests, where several of them utilize the expected spatial consistency between nearby observations.
Titan serves real-time operational applications that process massive amounts of observations measured by networks of automatic weather stations. Further developments include transforming Titan into a more flexible library of functions.
Cristian Lussana, Ole Einar Tveito, Andreas Dobler, and Ketil Tunheim
Earth Syst. Sci. Data, 11, 1531–1551, https://doi.org/10.5194/essd-11-1531-2019, https://doi.org/10.5194/essd-11-1531-2019, 2019
Short summary
Short summary
seNorge_2018 is a collection of observational gridded datasets for daily total precipitation and daily mean, minimum, and maximum temperature for the Norwegian mainland covering the time period from 1957 to the present day. The fields have 1 km of grid spacing. The data are used for applications in climatology, hydrology, and meteorology. seNorge_2018 provides a "gridded truth", especially in data-dense regions. The uncertainty increases with decreasing data density.
Cristian Lussana, Tuomo Saloranta, Thomas Skaugen, Jan Magnusson, Ole Einar Tveito, and Jess Andersen
Earth Syst. Sci. Data, 10, 235–249, https://doi.org/10.5194/essd-10-235-2018, https://doi.org/10.5194/essd-10-235-2018, 2018
Short summary
Short summary
The observational gridded climate datasets are among the primary sources of information for climate analysis and monitoring. The seNorge2 high-resolution dataset of daily total precipitation (1957–2017) constitutes a valuable meteorological input for snow and hydrological simulations which are routinely conducted over Norway for research and to support operational applications for civil protection purposes. The dataset and the seNorge2 software are publicly available for download.
F. Uboldi, A. N. Sulis, C. Lussana, M. Cislaghi, and M. Russo
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 18, 981–995, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-18-981-2014, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-18-981-2014, 2014
M. Bentsen, I. Bethke, J. B. Debernard, T. Iversen, A. Kirkevåg, Ø. Seland, H. Drange, C. Roelandt, I. A. Seierstad, C. Hoose, and J. E. Kristjánsson
Geosci. Model Dev., 6, 687–720, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-6-687-2013, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-6-687-2013, 2013
C. Lussana
Adv. Sci. Res., 10, 59–64, https://doi.org/10.5194/asr-10-59-2013, https://doi.org/10.5194/asr-10-59-2013, 2013
Cited articles
Alerskans, E., Lussana, C., Nipen, T. N., and Seierstad, I. A.: Optimizing
Spatial Quality Control for a Dense Network of Meteorological Stations, J. Atmos. Oceanic Tech., 39, 973–984, https://doi.org/10.1175/JTECH-D-21-0184.1, 2022. a
Bárdossy, A., Seidel, J., and El Hachem, A.: The use of personal weather
station observations to improve precipitation estimation and interpolation,
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 25, 583–601, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-25-583-2021, 2021. a
Båserud, L., Lussana, C., Nipen, T. N., Seierstad, I. A., Oram, L., and
Aspelien, T.: TITAN automatic spatial quality control of meteorological
in-situ observations, Adv. Sci. Res., 17, 153–163, https://doi.org/10.5194/asr-17-153-2020, 2020. a
Colli, M., Lanza, L., and Chan, P.: Co-located tipping-bucket and optical drop counter RI measurements and a simulated correction algorithm, Atmos. Res., 119, 3–12, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosres.2011.07.018, 2013. a
de Vos, L., Leijnse, H., Overeem, A., and Uijlenhoet, R.: The potential of
urban rainfall monitoring with crowdsourced automatic weather stations in
Amsterdam, Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 21, 765–777, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-21-765-2017, 2017. a
de Vos, L. W., Raupach, T. H., Leijnse, H., Overeem, A., Berne, A., and
Uijlenhoet, R.: High-Resolution Simulation Study Exploring the Potential of
Radars, Crowdsourced Personal Weather Stations, and Commercial Microwave
Links to Monitor Small-Scale Urban Rainfall, Water Resour. Res., 54,
10293–10312, https://doi.org/10.1029/2018WR023393, 2018. a
de Vos, L. W., Leijnse, H., Overeem, A., and Uijlenhoet, R.: Quality Control
for Crowdsourced Personal Weather Stations to Enable Operational Rainfall
Monitoring, Geophys. Res. Lett., 46, 8820–8829, https://doi.org/10.1029/2019GL083731, 2019. a
Finnish Meteorological Institute: The Finnish Meteorological Institute's open data, https://en.ilmatieteenlaitos.fi/open-data (last access: 30 May 2023), 2023. a
Frei, C. and Isotta, F. A.: Ensemble Spatial Precipitation Analysis from
Rain-Gauge Data – Methodology and Application in the European Alps, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 124, 5757–5778, https://doi.org/10.1029/2018JD030004, 2019. a
Frogner, I.-L., Singleton, A. T., Køltzow, M. Ø., and Andrae, U.:
Convection-permitting ensembles: Challenges related to their design and use,
Q. J. Roy. Meteorol. Soc., 145, 90–106, https://doi.org/10.1002/qj.3525, 2019. a
Haakenstad, H. and Øyvind Breivik: NORA3. Part II: Precipitation and
Temperature Statistics in Complex Terrain Modeled with a Nonhydrostatic
Model, J. Appl. Meteorol. Clim., 61, 1549–1572,
https://doi.org/10.1175/JAMC-D-22-0005.1, 2022. a
Habib, E., Krajewski, W. F., and Kruger, A.: Sampling Errors of Tipping-Bucket Rain Gauge Measurements, J. Hydrol. Eng., 6, 159–166,
https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)1084-0699(2001)6:2(159), 2001. a
Jolliffe, I. T. and Stephenson, D. B.: Forecast verification, Wiley, Oxford,
ISBN 978-0-470-66071-3, 2012. a
Lanza, L. G. and Stagi, L.: Certified accuracy of rainfall data as a standard
requirement in scientific investigations, Adv. Geosci., 16, 43–48, https://doi.org/10.5194/adgeo-16-43-2008, 2008.
a
Lanza, L. G. and Stagi, L.: High resolution performance of catching type rain
gauges from the laboratory phase of the WMO Field Intercomparison of Rain
Intensity Gauges, Atmos. Res., 94, 555–563,
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosres.2009.04.012, 2009. a
Lanzante, J. R.: Resistand, robust and non-parametric techniques for the
analysis of climate data: theory and examples, including applications to
historical radiosonde station data, Int. J. Climatol., 16, 1197–1226,
https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1097-0088(199611)16:11<1197::AID-JOC89>3.0.CO;2-L, 1996. a
Lussana, C., Uboldi, F., and Salvati, M. R.: A spatial consistency test for
surface observations from mesoscale meteorological networks, Q. J. Roy. Meteorol. Soc., 136, 1075–1088, https://doi.org/10.1002/qj.622, 2010. a
Lussana, C., Nipen, T. N., Seierstad, I. A., and Elo, C. A.: Ensemble-based
statistical interpolation with Gaussian anamorphosis for the spatial analysis
of precipitation, Nonl. Processes Geophys., 28, 61–91,
https://doi.org/10.5194/npg-28-61-2021, 2021. a, b
Mandement, M. and Caumont, O.: Contribution of personal weather stations to the observation of deep-convection features near the ground, Nat. Hazards Earth Syst. Sci., 20, 299–322, https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-20-299-2020, 2020. a
Netatmo: The easy way to make your AC smart, https://www.netatmo.com/ (last access: 30 May 2023), 2023. a
Nipen, T. N., Seierstad, I. A., Lussana, C., Kristiansen, J., and Hov, Ø.:
Adopting Citizen Observations in Operational Weather Prediction, B. Am. Meteorol. Soc., 101, E43–E57, https://doi.org/10.1175/BAMS-D-18-0237.1, 2020. a
Orlanski, I.: A rational subdivision of scales for atmospheric processes, B. Am. Meteorol. Soc., 56, 527–530, 1975. a
Soci, C., Bazile, E., Besson, F., and Landelius, T.: High-resolution
precipitation re-analysis system for climatological purposes, Tellus A, 68, 29879, https://doi.org/10.3402/tellusa.v68.29879, 2016. a
Stagnaro, M., Colli, M., Lanza, L. G., and Chan, P. W.: Performance of
post-processing algorithms for rainfall intensity using measurements from
tipping-bucket rain gauges, Atmos. Meas. Tech., 9, 5699–5706, https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-9-5699-2016, 2016. a
The Norwegian centre for climate services: Observations and weather statistics, https://seklima.met.no/ (last access: 30 May 2023), 2023. a
The Norwegian Meteorological Institute: The Norwegian Meteorological Institute's open data, https://frost.met.no/index.html (last access: 30 May 2023), 2023. a
The Swedish Meteorological and Hydrological Institute: The Swedish Meteorological and Hydrological Institute's open data, https://opendata.smhi.se (last access: 30 May 2023), 2023. a
Thunis, P. and Bornstein, R.: Hierarchy of mesoscale flow assumptions and
equations, J. Atmos. Sci., 53, 380–397,
https://doi.org/10.1175/1520-0469(1996)053<0380:HOMFAA>2.0.CO;2, 1996. a
Tian, Y., Huffman, G. J., Adler, R. F., Tang, L., Sapiano, M., Maggioni, V.,
and Wu, H.: Modeling errors in daily precipitation measurements: Additive or
multiplicative?, Geophys. Res. Lett., 40, 2060–2065, https://doi.org/10.1002/grl.50320, 2013. a
Uboldi, F., Lussana, C., and Salvati, M.: Three-dimensional spatial
interpolation of surface meteorological observations from high-resolution
local networks, Meteorol. Appl., 15, 331–345, https://doi.org/10.1002/met.76, 2008.
a
Wilks, D. S.: Statistical methods in the atmospheric sciences, in: 4th Edn., Elsevier, https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-815823-4.00009-2, 2019. a, b
WMO: WMO-No.1160: Manual on the WMO Integrated Global Observing System: Annex VIII to the WMO Technical Regulations, Tech. Rep. 1160, World Meteorological Organization, ISBN 978-92-63-11160-9, 2021a. a
WMO: WMO-No.49_volI: Technical Regulations, Volume I: General Meteorological
Standards and Recommended Practices, Tech. Rep. 49, World Meteorological
Organization, ISBN 978-92-63-10049-8, https://library.wmo.int/doc_num.php?explnum_id=10955 (last access: 30 May 2023), 2021b.
a
WMO: WMO-No.49_volIII: Technical Regulations, Volume III: Hydrology, Tech. Rep. 49, World Meteorological Organization, ISBN 978-92-63-10049-8, https://library.wmo.int/doc_num.php?explnum_id=11293 (last access: 30 May 2023), 2021c. a
Short summary
We have compared hourly precipitation totals measured by rain gauges installed and maintained by citizens against professional weather stations managed by the national weather services of Finland, Norway and Sweden. The manufacturer of the citizen rain gauges is Netatmo. Despite the heterogeneity of citizens' measurements, our results show that the two data sources are comparable with each other, though with some limitations. The results also show how to improve the accuracy of citizens' data.
We have compared hourly precipitation totals measured by rain gauges installed and maintained by...