Articles | Volume 23
https://doi.org/10.5194/asr-23-1-2026
https://doi.org/10.5194/asr-23-1-2026
18 Jun 2026
 | 18 Jun 2026

Which forecast errors matter most? Assessing public priorities in weather forecast accuracy

Christoph Sauter and Kathrin Wapler

Viewed

Total article views: 101 (including HTML, PDF, and XML)
HTML PDF XML Total Supplement BibTeX EndNote
76 22 3 101 4 7 5
  • HTML: 76
  • PDF: 22
  • XML: 3
  • Total: 101
  • Supplement: 4
  • BibTeX: 7
  • EndNote: 5
Views and downloads (calculated since 18 Jun 2026)
Cumulative views and downloads (calculated since 18 Jun 2026)

Viewed (geographical distribution)

Total article views: 79 (including HTML, PDF, and XML) Thereof 79 with geography defined and 0 with unknown origin.
Country # Views %
  • 1
1
 
 
 
 
Latest update: 01 Aug 2026
Download
Short summary
Weather forecasts have greatly improved over recent decades, yet errors remain. We studied how people judge different types of forecast errors using two short surveys. People rated errors differently depending on their consequences, with forecasts that underestimated the intensity and persistence of events judged most negatively. These findings show what forecast users value and contribute to the development of verification methods that better reflect public needs.
Share